My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2016 09 13 SP
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
FINANCE COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Finance Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Finance Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2016 09 13 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:34:15 PM
Creation date
9/14/2016 1:05:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
FCPKT 2016 09 13 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Community Design Program Key Indicators <br />Development Review Sub -Program <br />Goals <br />Sustain an inclusive, family -friendly community with a small-town atmosphere, effective <br />and efficient building services and effective preservation of the City's historic structures <br />through a voluntary system <br />Objectives <br />A well-connected and safe community that is easy for all people to walk, bike, and drive <br />in. Neighborhoods that are rated highly by residents and thriving commercial areas. An <br />open and inclusive long-range planning process with significant citizen participation. <br />INDICATOR <br />UNIT <br />2015 <br />ACTUAL <br />2016 <br />ESTIMATED <br />2017 <br />PROJECTED <br />Context Data and General Information <br />Population <br />Residents <br />20,047 <br />20,100 <br />20,100 <br />$ Per Resident <br />Exp./ <br />Resident <br />Workload <br />Pre -Application Conferences <br /># Held <br />New Metric <br />Development Review Applications (PUD, <br />SRU, Plats, etc.) <br /># Processed <br />Administrative Reviews/Amendments <br /># Processed <br />Building Permits Processed <br /># Processed <br />Building Inspections Completed <br /># Completed <br />Efficiency <br />Development Applications Processed per <br />Employee <br /># Processed/ <br />FTE <br />New Metric <br />Building Permit Processed Per Employee <br /># Processed/ <br />FTE <br />Inspections Completed Per Employee <br /># Completed <br />/FTE <br />Building Permit Review Time <br />Ave. Review <br />Time <br />New Metric <br />Development Review Time <br />Ave. Review <br />Time <br />New Metric <br />Effectiveness <br />"Planning review process for new <br />development" Rating' <br />% Excellent <br />or Good <br />71 % <br />(2012) <br />° <br />63 /o <br />"Building permit process" Rating 1 <br />% Excellent <br />or Good <br />New Metric <br />60% <br />"Building/construction inspection process" <br />Rating' <br />%Excellent <br />or Good <br />77% <br />(2012) <br />° <br />65 /o <br />Building Inspection Rollovers <br />Ave./Week <br />New Metric <br />Customer service and program rating2 <br />Rating <br />New Metric <br />Alignment of staff recommendation with <br />Council/Board/Commission decision <br />Rec/ <br />Decision <br />1 Based on the 2016 Citizen Survey results. <br />2 Based on evaluation cards submitted with each permit and development plan application, rating scale of 1=Excellent, 2=Good, 3=Fair, 4=Poor <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.