My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2016 09 14
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD
>
2000-2019 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2016 09 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 8:21:25 AM
Creation date
9/23/2016 9:14:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
OSABPKT 2016 09 14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />August 10th 2016 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />how properties get added to the list, since addition to a list could have land value <br />impacts. Helen asked for guidance on to do this exercise without bothering landowners <br />or having unintended consequences for them. Helen asked Jeff if Council would support <br />the retention of a realtor to fill in information gaps for open parcels within the City. Jeff <br />thought so. Missy asked whether OSAB could donate its budget to help pay for this <br />realtor. Ember thought that might be possible but that Joe and Malcolm are currently <br />discussing when this work should occur. Jeff thought that the big, comprehensive list <br />could identify the top 10 target properties and then Staff could spend about an hour on <br />each of the top properties compiling a dossier summarizing possible goals for it, its <br />history, and its current status. Missy asked that there be some documentation of the <br />City's institutional history/knowledge added to the dossier. Jeff suggested that Boulder <br />County may have templates for this sort of organization that Louisville could use to help <br />with organization. Laura added that the County may even have dossiers on some of <br />these particular properties that are already public information, saving time. Jeff wanted <br />to include information on what the potential effect of development on the properties <br />would be. Spencer felt like this is really a job for a consultant, and maybe the City <br />should simply to pay the necessary money to have it done promptly and well. Several <br />board members agreed with him. Helen summarized what she felt the board was <br />expressing: the board wants summaries and "narratives" for each property, but wants to <br />keep the traditional ranking spreadsheet for the board's purposes. Helen identified two <br />action items: <br />— Identify a format for dossiers/abstracts for each property. <br />— Check into whether it would be possible to hire a consultant to do this work. <br />X. Discussion Item: Louisville Ranger Program Update and Baseline Data - <br />Presented by: Kelsey Harter, Ranger Naturalist <br />Kelsey introduced herself. She has a background in both recreation <br />management and resource management. She has worked for Boulder County and the <br />City of Boulder. She has training/certification as an EMT, at the Police Academy, and as <br />a wild -land fire fighter. She is excited by the opportunity to build a ranger program for <br />the City from the beginning stages. Putting together the ranger uniform, badge, <br />patches, and equipment (e.g. the radio, truck, baton) ended up being complex and took <br />longer than anticipated, but Kelsey started patrolling in uniform over the July 4th <br />weekend. The Police Department has been very cooperative and helpful. She has also <br />been working with Boulder County Dispatch, so they can dispatch her when there is an <br />issue on City Open Space or Park property. Another issue that had to be resolved <br />before Kelsey could begin regular patrol was an enforcement loophole staff found in the <br />City code over the winter. Staff and PD also had to decide which codes/titles they <br />wanted the ranger to enforce (e.g. camping, trespassing, wildlife, dog rules, etc.). <br />Kelsey and staff have been working on a policy manual to help communicate the <br />ranger's role and responsibilities to the public, City staff, the Police Department, and <br />Boulder County. Kelsey and staff designed and began a contact log so she can collect <br />data on what she's seeing and her interactions with the public. Kelsey passed around a <br />sample log pad for board members to see. They also designed a written warning notice <br />"ticket book" for her, so they can identify repeat offenders (also passed around). Helen <br />asked how a "warning" escalates to an actual summons. Kelsey explained the process <br />and clarified that she also has her own separate ticket booklet for immediate summons <br />without warnings. Laura asked whether any formal warnings had been issued yet. <br />Kelsey answered that she had written several warnings, especially for encroachment <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.