Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 17, 2016 <br />Page 9 of 10 <br />➢ 749 Wildrose Way — Variance Request — A request for an after -the -fact variance from <br />Section 17.16.030 of the Louisville Municipal Code (LMC) for relief from rear accessory <br />setback requirements. Case #16 -027 -VA <br />• Applicant & Owner: Greg Godec, 749 Wildrose Way <br />• Case Manager: Scott Robinson, Planner II <br />➢ Resolution of Denial - 2252 Crown Circle — Variance Request — Resolution 01, <br />Series 2016. A request for a variance from Section 17.12.040 of the Louisville Municipal <br />Code (LMC) for relief from front and side setback and maximum lot coverage <br />requirements to allow additions to the garage and second story. <br />• Applicant & Owner: Terry Nelson, 2252 Crown Circle <br />• Representative: Patrick Hubbell, Summit Studio Architects <br />• Case Manager: Scott Robinson, Planner II <br />D. Resolution of Denial - 346 McKinley Court — Variance Request — Resolution 02, <br />Series 2016. A request for a variance from the Dutch Creek planned unit development <br />(PUD) for relief from the side setback requirement to allow an addition to the second <br />story. <br />• Applicant & Owner: Rachel and Dan Fox, 346 McKinley Ct <br />• Case Manager: Scott Robinson, Planner II <br />➢ 940 Caledonia St — Variance Request — A request for a variance Section <br />17.12.050 of the Louisville Municipal Cod- C) for relief from front rear setback <br />and maximum floor area requirements t. 'w addition the existing house. <br />Case #16 -022 -VA <br />• Applicant & Owner: Gary Doty, 940 Caledonia St <br />• Case Manager: Scott Robinson, Planner II <br />Staff Comments: There are no new a <br />Board Comments: <br />Meseck says I have talked with Robinson`id thckle about getting a seventh <br />member or an alternate added in, especially knowing that we will be one short next month. <br />Given our past history, it is probably more than that. Is there a time line for the procedure to get <br />another person added? Do they need to interview with the City? Do they need to wait a period <br />of time? <br />Robinson says they must be approved by City Council. Midterm appointments are handled with <br />the Mayor interviewing a candidate and if he feels they should be appointed, he will make a <br />recommendation to City Council. Once they are appointed, they can join the Board immediately. <br />Council meetings are first and third Tuesdays. <br />Campbell asks what is the reason for this. <br />Ewy says we don't want to end up with four way votes. <br />Meseck says we have lost meetings because we did not have a quorum. <br />Robinson says there are supposed to be six regular members and an associate member of the <br />Board. Currently, the associate member seat is vacant because Council did not appoint anyone <br />to that seat in their latest round of appointments. We have been at minimum quorum recently <br />and had no quorum last month. There is a request from some members of the Board that <br />Council appoint someone to that associate seat. <br />Campbell says I am puzzled by members not showing up. <br />Meseck says our members have full time jobs and travel quite a bit as well as health issues. <br />Malmquist says it is a reflection of the summer season as well. <br />Campbell says I can fully understand that there are health issues. But I am puzzled by <br />Members not showing up because of a job. Maybe, they should not have applied for the Board. <br />Ewy says we are on three year terms. I own my own business and this could be me in a couple <br />months, that I make the choice between attending a meeting or making a deadline the next day. <br />That is a hard call, but I know that if we have a full Board and I am the only one absent, it makes <br />the decision a little easier. Tonight, I am very sick and I knew we would not have a quorum if 1 <br />at this tim <br />