Laserfiche WebLink
Loning variance Request: <br />subject Lot: 94C Caledonia St., Louisville_ Co. 80027 <br />Requesting a variance of 5 ft. (southern setback, back), 17 ft. (North setback, Front) and square foot <br />ratio increase (67 ft.) <br />Justifications: <br />1. That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions s..cn . narrowness or <br />shallowness of lot or exceptional topographical or other physical conditio..s re...1:a. ro me <br />affected property. <br />Property is a split lot with a total area of 3198 which ereatly reduces the ability to meet current <br />setback requirements. <br />2. Thai rhe unusual circumstances or conditions do not exist throughout the neighborhood or <br />distritr in which the property is located <br />Typical lot sizes are twice the size of our lot. <br />3. r hat because of such physical circumstances or conditions, rhe proper cannon reasonably be <br />developed in conformity with rhe provisions of this rifle 17. <br />ihe only area buildable by code is the vvest facing side of house_ see drawing. <br />4. r not such unnecessary narusnip nas nor peen created by rhe applicant. <br />i Ile comrination or a small lot size ana file strature or tie Mouse is limiting the compliance <br />with tfie setMacR regulations. <br />!fie sii.e of the Moose anti tRe ,ize or trk lot inliioit tFie ability to upgralle tfe structure widlout a <br />variance of the Front Setback, Rear Setback ana ..geare root ratio. <br />5. That the variance if granted will not alter the essential of rn- ..e.gnoornooa or <br />district in which the properly is located nor substantially or permanently i...p i.. rn. <br />appropriate use or development of adjacent propeM. <br />If the variance were granted it would not alter the essential character of the neishborhood: the <br />house is the only one on the South side of Caledonia Street facine north. Therefore if the <br />proposed addition were to be located within the allowed setback variance request, it would not <br />be any closer to the lot line than it already is. The rear setback would not interfere with any <br />neighbors. The attached photo shows that there is not a dwelline behind the rear setback. <br />