My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Business Retention and Development Committee Agenda and Packet 2016 10 03
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUSINESS RETENTION & DEV COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Business Retention and Development Committee Agenda and Packet 2016 10 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:09:38 PM
Creation date
10/7/2016 10:43:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BRADPKT 2016 10 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Business Retention & Development Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 6, 2016 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />construction projects cause disruption, there is not an agreed upon vision for downtown, <br />parking remains an issue, rents are rising and retailers have varying hours. <br />The downtown retailer group will meet again and focus on standard hours of operation, <br />a retailer focused special event and a marketing campaign. <br />DeJong reviewed components of a successful downtown on the slides in the packet. <br />Chair Loo said developing a shared vision for the future will be tough because there are <br />many shared visions. Louisville does not have the residential density other <br />communities have. Her opinion is there is not political or citizen will for higher density. <br />Commissioner Menaker said the urban renewal area will help downtown once it is fully <br />developed. He said downtown should be restaurants and specialty stores. Jim Tienken <br />said people from outside the area need to be brought in to support that. <br />Commissioner Staufer said he does not see retail being a part of the vision for <br />downtown. He said retailers need to stay open later. He said we are content with status <br />quo whereas other communities are thinking of the future. He said that once Louisville <br />is not "the place" to be maybe people will start talking about things such as a parking <br />structure. <br />Randy Caranci agrees with Commissioner Staufer. <br />DeJong said we are approaching downtown as a reactive rather than a proactive place. <br />There was a discussion of vision of downtown. Commissioner Pritchard said conditions <br />in downtown Louisville are the best they have been. Jim Tienken thinks downtown is <br />the crown jewel of Louisville and we need to market it as special. Parking is a huge part <br />of the equation and action needs to be taken. City Manager Fleming said there has <br />been action taken: Council spent $700,000 on a property for parking. He asked where <br />the Chamber and DBA are in an effort to remedy this issue. Tienken said there is no <br />money for DBA to invest. Fleming suggested a Business Improvement District. <br />Pritchard agrees with Fleming that the City is making strides. <br />Commissioner Menaker said government has been overly responsive to the vocal <br />minority. Discussions are fear -driven and never acknowledge change. Would like to see <br />a change in the discussion. <br />Commissioner Reichenberg said we need to define what makes downtown special now <br />and keep refreshing it. <br />Commissioner Lathrop said there needs to be a major change. Pine to Short St. needs <br />to be closed off to traffic to create a new atmosphere. <br />Mike Kranzdorf agrees with the discussion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.