Laserfiche WebLink
FOR OPEN SPACE BUFFER ZONES, TRAII,S, WII,DLIFE HABITATS, WETLANDS, <br />PRESERVATION AND FUTURE PARKS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE SUBMISSION OF <br />THE ORDINANCE TO A VOTE OF THE REGISTERED ELECTORS AT A SPECIAL <br />ELECTION CALLED FOR NOVEMBER 8, 1994 - 2ND READING - PUBLIC HEARING <br />CONT'D FROM 8/2/94 <br /> <br />Griffiths read by title only Ordinance No. 1157, Series 1994, "An ordinance providing for the <br />extension of the city's Use Tax to the use or consumption of residential construction and building <br />materials purchased at retail, for purposes of furthering the acquisition, improvement, or expansion <br />of educational facilities of Boulder Valley School District RE-2 serving the citizens of Louisville and <br />their school-age children, and for purposes of the acquisition of land in and around the city for open <br />space buffer zones, trails, wildlife habitats, wetlands, preservation and future parks; and providing for <br />the submission of the ordinance to a vote of the registered electors at a special election called for <br />November 8, 1994 - 2nd Reading - public hearing continued from 8/2/94." <br /> <br />Davidson opened the continuation of the public hearing on Ordinance No. 1157 calling for anyone <br />in the audience wishing to speak on this Ordinance. <br /> <br />NONE <br /> <br />Davidson closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Davidson called on the City Attorney. <br /> <br />Susan Griffiths, City Attorney, stated that before Council was a revised version of Ordinance No. <br />1157, providing that the city's use tax applicable to residential construction and building materials, <br />which will be only for a limited period of time chosen by Council (9 - 10 years). The Ordinance <br />allocates the revenues from the 3/8% open space tax approved by the voters last year as applied to <br />building materials purchased at retail for use in residential construction and building projects to parks <br />and open space purposes identified in the ordinance approved by the voters last year. She stated that <br />the Ordinance had been submitted to the city's Bond counsel for review for any suggested changes <br />in the Ordinance or the ballot question. Bond counsel had no suggestions for changes. <br /> <br />Mayer suggested using the 9 year period, because both taxes (3/8% open space tax and this tax) <br />would elapse at the same time without further voter approval. <br /> <br />Lathrop wanted an effective date. <br /> <br />Griffiths stated that as this is written it would be in effect the day after the election results are <br />certified, unless this Ordinance is amended. <br /> <br /> <br />