Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 18. 2016 <br />Page 12 of 14 <br />Councilmember Maloney stated the options for Parcel 0 have varying fiscal impacts <br />which could greatly affect the decision making on this plan. He reiterated his request for <br />this fiscal information. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton doesn't want to close the door on Transit -Oriented Development <br />in the area. Mayor Muckle agreed. There may not be a current demand for residential <br />but it may happen later. He does support additional office and retail space. There may <br />be a desire for some redevelopment in the area in the future. <br />Councilmember Loo asked if the Special Review Use options in the plan should be left <br />as proposed. Mayor Muckle would like it left as is. Councilmember Stolzmann would like <br />it removed and leave it as commercial. <br />Councilmember Keany stated he opposes residential development west of McCaslin <br />Boulevard and opposes the Special Review Use in that area. <br />Planner Robinson stated the existing zoning for the Colony Square site does allow for <br />residential with a Special Review Use but the Comprehensive Plan does not allow it. To <br />change so that residential is not allowed in Colony Square the Special Review Use <br />option would need to be removed. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann doesn't oppose the Special Review Use option for the area <br />from Cherry to Dillon, but would like it labeled Commercial in the plan so everyone <br />knows our first choice is commercial in that area. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated however we move forward we should consider changing <br />the existing zoning to protect the residential character behind the shopping areas on <br />Cherry Street. Current use -by -right allows three stories and we should consider <br />changing that to two stories. <br />Councilmember Leh shared Mayor Pro Tem Lipton's concerns that we need additional <br />fiscal information. He stated everyone states they want a vibrant commercial area on <br />McCaslin Boulevard, the question is how to get it or at least not inhibit it. We need to <br />make sure we make good use of the Bus Rapid Transit on US 36. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated we need to increase transit ridership but there might <br />be other options we need to consider for first and final mile connections. She doesn't <br />support the lane reduction. She would like to see more people using the existing plazas. <br />She doesn't support the HAWK signal. She is not convinced the two-story buffer is what <br />people want; many of those areas are one-story now, particularly behind Lark Avenue. <br />Councilmember Loo stated she thinks the area north of Cherry and south of the Balfour <br />Memory Unit should continue to be low rise and compatible with residences to the east. <br />Mayor Muckle liked the idea of adding a buffer in this area and assuring it will not have <br />residential. All agreed that is a good idea to not have residential in that area. <br />