Laserfiche WebLink
Mayer wondered when the land for the commercial development changed from commercial to <br />residential and how was it approved. He stated that there was never an amendment to the agreement <br />that changed the use from commercial to residential. It was just done by the Pine Street Park PUD. <br /> <br />Hoyt did not know. He stated that there may have been, as a piece of Pine Street. <br /> <br />Wood stated that, prior to submittal of Pine Street Park Subdivision and PUD, what he called the <br />1991 amendment to the McStain Master Plan, went before Planning Commission. It was based upon <br />this format and reflected the 106 lots on Centennial I vs. the commercial and cluster development. <br /> <br />Keany wondered if this would create an over-burden for the Recreation Center. <br /> <br />Hoyt felt there would probably be more uses from a townhouse project than in a single family. <br /> <br />Keany wondered if there would be traffic problems with the spur at the southwest comer of the <br />property. <br /> <br />Hoyt did not think so. <br /> <br />Davidson wondered if each one of the subsequent agreements were an amendment to the original <br />agreement. <br /> <br />Ca/friths stated that some of the subsequent agreements state specifically that they are an amendment <br />to the original annexation agreement, as in the 1985 agreement. <br /> <br />Davidson stated that R-E zoning refers to lot size, frontage, and not the 3.6 units per acre. <br /> <br />Wood stated that Section 17.12.040 specifies the yard and bulk requirements for all of the zoned <br />districts. It depends on the lay of the land. You would not necessarily get 3.6 units per acre. <br /> <br />Davidson wondered if a traffic study had been done. <br /> <br />Hanson stated that an update had been done by their engineer, which he reviewed with Council. <br />It did not cover possible Recreation Center expansion or the Fire Station, concerning emergency <br />access. Basically, the study addressed the capacity of the roadways to handle the traffic. The streets <br />within are 24' wide, with the emergency access being 20', as requested by the Fire Marshall. <br />Pedestrian access paths are 4' and 6' when adjacent to parking. Along the south property there is an <br />8' bikeway that connects the bikeway system through this area, as contemplated on the master <br />development plan. <br /> <br />Davidson wondered if they would have any problem complying with Resolution No. 36. <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br /> <br />