My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1994 10 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1994 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1994 10 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:38 PM
Creation date
5/26/2004 10:37:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
10/4/1994
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1994 10 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
multi-family use and a financial agreement that established equity over that process might be arrived <br />at. <br /> <br />Lathrop felt the city and McStain had abided by that plan for 14 years and he was not about to break <br />the integrity of the city. The city had a moral obligation. He commented that the McStain people <br />were good people and a good representation of developers. He felt the plan was sufficient to meet <br />the criteria and needs of the neighborhood. Immediately south of this project is an existing townhome <br />project which is not incompatible at all. <br /> <br />Levihn agreed with Lathrop's comments. He felt the schools were a non-issue, as by the time this <br />project gets offthe board the school issue will be dead as far as the new building, which will be built. <br /> <br />Davidson saw the Planning Commission and Planning Department's recommendations as <br />recommendations. As far as diversity, he felt that the vast majority of land that is annexed and zoned <br />is zoned for multi-family. No where in this area does the city have R-E size lots, so R-E size lots <br />would provide diversity. He felt for the most part they had met the criteria for Special Review Use, <br />but not totally. He stated that Council had found that private substantially substandard streets are <br />a major mistake, as every area of Louisville that has those streets, people complain and wonder when <br />the city is going to fix those streets. He preferred arbitration to avoid the high cost of Court. <br /> <br />Lathrop moved that Council approval of Resolution No. 54, Series 1994, a resolution approving a <br />Final Subdivision Plat, Final PUD Development Plan, and a Special Review Use for Centennial II, <br />with two conditions: <br /> <br />1.) <br /> <br />2.) <br /> <br />That an access easement to Via Appia across the Recreation Center property needed <br />to be indicated on the PUD and the Plat. Prior to recording of this PUD and Plat this <br />easement needed to be dedicated by separate instrument and recorded with recording <br />information noted on the PUD and Plat. <br />That no construction access shall be permitted from Owl Drive. All construction <br />access shall be from Via Appia. <br /> <br />Keany seconded. Roll call was taken. Motion failed by a 3 - 4 vote with Davidson, Howard, Sisk, <br />and Mayer voting against. <br /> <br />Howard moved that Council direct the City Attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and conclusions of <br />law consistant with the hearing to be presented to Council meeting in two weeks. Seconded by <br />Mayer. Roll call was taken. Motion passed by a 4 - 3 vote with Keany, Lathrop, and Levihn voting <br />against. <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.