My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 11 14
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2004-2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 11 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:20:27 AM
Creation date
12/2/2016 10:48:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RCPKT 2016 11 14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />October 10, 2016 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />2017 DRAFT BUDGET <br />DeJong reviewed the 2017 draft budget for the LRC. TIF revenue is estimated <br />based on information from the County. DeJong has requested funds for a parking <br />analysis. <br />Commissioner Fisher asked questions about proposals and the parking study. <br />DeJong said no proposals have been received and that he has not developed the <br />RFP yet for the parking study. <br />Fleming said Council has not seen a parking study as a pressing issue. It is an <br />issue but not as high a priority as other items. Staff finds that it is a more <br />pressing issue. Information to understand how to manage property we bought for <br />parking would be helpful. <br />Commissioner Tofte said this may be premature is Council is not willing to look at <br />it. <br />Chair Becker would like specifics from someone who believes parking is a <br />hindrance to development. DeJong said he can ask Dave Sinkey to come to an <br />LRC meeting. <br />Randy Caranci said it is hard to pull the trigger on putting development together <br />when you can't solve the parking issue. He said parking will always be an issue, <br />especially for office space. <br />The amount for parking will be left in and await approval from Council. <br />Chair Becker is uncomfortable spending money on a plaque and party for self - <br />recognition. Commissioner Tofte likes seeing plaques on City buildings. He likes <br />to recognize the effort. Pritchard would prefer that money go toward parking. <br />Commissioner Lathrop believes a simple bronze plaque would be appropriate. <br />He would like to give more thought to the party/celebration. He finds a lot of <br />people don't know what is going on in town so to call attention to it may be a <br />good thing. Commissioner Gorsevski said a party may be appropriate and agrees <br />with Tofte that a simple plaque may be appropriate. Commissioner Fisher would <br />like to do something in both areas; plaque and celebration. <br />Chair Becker said it goes back to "why are we doing this." <br />Commissioner Tofte would like to change the name of the line item to something <br />like "Gateway opening." Several Commissioners would like DELO and Tebo to <br />pay for or contribute to the event. <br />Randy Caranci likes the plaque idea as a sense of history. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.