Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2016 11 16

Home Browse Search

Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes October 19, 2016 Page 10 of 16 Motion made by DeJong to deny Case #16 -027 -VA, 749 Wildrose Way — Variance Request — An after -the -fact variance from Section 17.16.030 of the Louisville Municipal Code (LMC) for relief from rear accessory setback requirements to permit a previously constructed pergola, seconded by Campbell. Roll call vote. Name Vote Andrew Meseck Yes James Stuart No Leslie Ewy Yes Gunnar Malmquist No Thomas DeJong Yes Lowell Campbell Yes Alison Gorsevski n/a Motion passed/failed: Fail Motion approved 4-2. Meeting breaks at 7:45 pm, reconvenes at 7:50 pm. ➢ 2214 W Hecla Drive — Variance Request — •uest for a varian m the Takoda General Development Plan for relief from etback requirements t• •w a new pergola. Case #16 -038 -VA Applicant & Owner: Keith & Mary Beth Rensberger, - Hecla D Case Manager: Scott Robinson, Senior Planner Public Notice Certification: Posted in City Hall, Public Library, Recreation Center, and the Courts and Police Building and mailed to surrounding property owners on September 30, 2016, published in the Boulder Daily Camera on October 2, 2016, and the property was posted on September 30, 2016. DeJong moved and Ewy seconded a motion that all requirements have been satisfied and the application submitted by the applicants has been properly filed. Motion passed by unanimous voice vote. Meseck asked for disclosures from the board members for any site visits, ex parte communications, and any conflicts of interest or required disclosures on the application Campbell did a site visit, had no ex parte communications, and has no conflicts of interest for the application. Malmquist did no site visit but is familiar with the property and neighborhood, had no ex parte communications, and has no conflicts of interest for the application. DeJong did no site visit but is familiar with the neighborhood, had no ex parte communications, and has no conflicts of interest for the application. Meseck did no site visit, had no ex parte communications, and has no conflicts of interest for the application. Stuart did a site visit, had no ex parte communications, and has no conflicts of interest for the application. Ewy did no site visit but am familiar with the neighborhood and this property, had no ex parte communications, and has no conflicts of interest for the application. Meseck asked the applicants if they were ready to proceed with the hearing. The applicants indicated they were ready to proceed. Staff Report of Facts and Issues: Robinson presented from Power Point: