My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2016 11 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2016 11 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:03:13 PM
Creation date
12/2/2016 10:50:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOAPKT 2016 11 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 19, 2016 <br />Page 13 of 16 <br />a way that the adjacent home is one-half story higher than ours due to lot elevation change and <br />is quite imposing from our perspective. It literally looms over us. There is a direct line of site <br />from their deck into our entire outside area, all along the south side of our house and into our <br />interior living and dining area. The loss of privacy goes both ways as we too will be looking up <br />our neighbors' figurative skirts when they try to enjoy their deck view. Other patio homes in <br />Steel Ranch have a similar 10' side yard; however, their outdoor spaces adjoin the garages of <br />their neighbors. They are designed in a way that protects each resident's privacy. This <br />consideration goes to criterion 5. We are asking for relief from the 5' setback rule so that we can <br />build a simple wooden pergola which will help to mitigate the line of sight issue for both parties. <br />While we understand the need for some standards and rules to be set when a new development <br />is in the planning stages, we do believe that our situation warrants another look. <br />Commission Questions of Applicant: <br />Ewy says I want to make sure I understand entirely that it is loss of privacy because you have a <br />sight line from another living space into your living space. Rensberger says yes. <br />Ewy asks did you explore fully covered decks that would give you more covered space. Are you <br />married to the pergola? Are you working with an arc '° ct? Did they look at ways to create a <br />structure that would comply with setbacks but still ou that privacy you are seeking? <br />Mary Beth Rensburger says that would give u -s extension . our home which isn't <br />reasonable. <br />Ewy says you can extend within 2' of your property <br />Mary Beth says we did not explore that. I was surprise I came to apply for a building <br />permit and was told we needed to have our support pos t down the middle of our patio, <br />which is 9.5' deep. Our contractor suggested for a 30' run, .uld have three to four posts at <br />the very least. You can't get a table in there and you'd bump! if you pulled your grill away <br />from the wall. The final post would be centered in the middle of s that lead to the other part <br />of our side yard which is a lower level. It's not so much the coverage out from the house as it is <br />the support posts which would make it infeasible. <br />Ewy asks if the contractor discussed any othe uctural options or shortening the covered <br />span. <br />Mary Beth says we talked to him before we app for the permit. He has not been involved <br />with us except to say, you must get an answ <br />Rensberger says that cantilevering would wolrett he ends, but what about the middle. Can we <br />reasonably do this? <br />Meseck says the 6' fence cannot be raised without another variance, is that correct? <br />Rensberger says yes. <br />DeJong says if you were to adhere to the 5' setback, have you looked at metal options. Has <br />there been any discussion with the Lanterns HOA with regard to the planting of strategic trees? <br />Mary Beth says we have talked to the Lanterns HOA and they are not doing landscaping yet, <br />so there has been no firm commitment that it will look any different than it does now with the <br />existing properties that have been landscaped. The trees currently are 30' apart. <br />DeJong says the cost of a couple of trees versus the cost of a pergola, whether the offer of a <br />couple of trees in that location once they filled out, might provide you with adequate screening. <br />Meseck says regarding the patio itself, is it already built? <br />Rensberger says it is 9.5' out from the house and 30' long. It was built before the fence and <br />before the Lanterns was rezoned. We did not know if there would be a fence or whether we <br />would install a fence. We did not want to take any chances and have to adjust the patio. <br />Mary Beth says we are the only property that abuts there. There is an alley way that separates <br />another line of houses and a tree landscaped area that gives them about a 55' buffer. To us, <br />this seems unique. <br />DeJong says with regard to the actual pergola construction, the only materials you looked at <br />were wood. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.