Laserfiche WebLink
be floodproofed and identifies the base flood elevation for the addition. Staff finds the <br />information provided meets the intent of this submittal requirement. <br />3. Certification by a registered professional engineer or architect that the floodproofing <br />methods for any nonresidential structure meet the floodproofing standards and practices <br />specified in_section 17.56.250; and <br />Since the finished floor of the addition is below the based flood elevation, the Floodplain <br />Study includes certification that the final building design will include floodproofing <br />conforming to LMC requirements. Staff will verify that the specific design meets <br />requirements as part of the building permit review. <br />4. Description of the extent to which any watercourse will be altered or relocated as a <br />result of proposed development. <br />The proposal does not result in an altered or relocated watercourse. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff finds the proposal complies with the applicable procedures, regulations and requirements <br />for Floodplain Development Permits and recommends approval. <br />BOARD ACTION: <br />The Board needs to find that the application meets all criteria, insofar as applicable, in order to <br />grant the Floodplain Development Permit. The Board should adopt a motion for the request, <br />and establish findings for said decisions in the public record, either through reference to the <br />applicant's or staff's findings in the existing written record or through additional Board findings, <br />as expressed during the public hearing. <br />ATTACHMENTS: <br />1. Application <br />2. August 25, 2016 Request Letter <br />3. October 26, 2016 Revised Floodplain Study <br />4. Proposed PUD <br />5 <br />