My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2016 11 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2016 11 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:03:13 PM
Creation date
12/2/2016 10:50:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOAPKT 2016 11 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 19, 2016 <br />Page 7 of 16 <br />Campbell asks if Godec is the original owner. When did you become the owner? <br />Godec says I am the second owner of the property. I bought it in 2000. The trees were already <br />planted. Xcel had been through three times, once before I owned the property and twice before <br />this to top the trees. It was my assumption that this was a normal process. <br />Campbell says I am often surprised by people planting trees under power lines. <br />Public Comment in Favor: <br />Steve Castillo, 902 Grove Drive, Louisville, CO <br />I live across the street from the side of Greg's house. We are the original owners of our house <br />and have lived in it for 26 years. Regarding the height question about the wires, I have no idea <br />how tall they are but my guess would be more like 75' off the ground. In the time we have been <br />in the house, they have replaced those poles. It seemed to me that the poles got much higher. <br />Whatever the distance is, it is significant from the top of the pergola. I think it is important to note <br />that Greg is a victim of location in two ways. The City approved a PUD that included this right- <br />of-way and, at least in our neighborhood, his is the only house where the wires directly go over <br />the house. There is a house behind our backyard where it splits between a couple of yards. Xcel <br />came in and leveled trees that were there as well. Further to the north, they cut trees down to <br />the ground that were probably 20' tall that were along the sidewalk. It was a rather startling <br />denuding of the sidewalk to see them go. I would note there is a small irony in the presentation <br />package. The aerial photo taken at any earlier date shows the trees. One of the reasons the <br />trees were there was to provide shade as well as noise abatement. The trees aren't subject to <br />the same kind of setbacks. Throughout our neighborhood, people have planted trees near their <br />fence but the branches go beyond the fence. I am speaking in favor of Greg's motion. I believe <br />that items 1 and 2 are met which then sets up a cascade for the rest of them. Greg made <br />reference to the house that is nearby. Two doors up, there are two structures within 12" of the <br />fence line. Why are they not being called before you? Probably because they are old, they are <br />weathered to be the same color as the fence which makes them invisible, and the vegetation <br />planted has grown up them. They are barely noticeable. My guess is that in time, it will happen <br />to Greg's as well. Halfway down Tyler between Washington and Via Appia, there is a backyard <br />where someone put in 20-30' tall poles within a few feet of the fence so that they can string a <br />tarp from their back deck to these poles and create a shaded area. As far as I know, they are <br />not before you. There is a little inconsistency in how we are dealing with this. I think we do need <br />to have a little respect for how Greg's property has been the victim, not only to a changing rule <br />from Xcel, but a rule that was designed for fire prevention in the high country. We are not in the <br />high country. I think what happened here is Xcel got tired of sending a crew in every couple of <br />years to top the trees. It was more cost efficient in the long run to simply mow them down. I <br />think Greg should not be suffering for that. <br />Campbell asks about noise abatement. Can you explain to me how the trees would solve that <br />problem? <br />Castillo says trees just do that. A thick branch with lots of leaves will muffle the sound of traffic. <br />Greg backs up to an intersection. There are three or four school buses every morning, nine <br />months of the year. It is a corridor for people going between McCaslin and South Boulder Road. <br />If there is thick vegetation, it blocks sound. We lost a cherry tree on our property one year ago. <br />For 25 years, it provided a fair amount of noise abatement because of the thickness of the <br />vegetation. <br />Public Comment in Opposition: None. <br />Summary and request by Staff and Applicant: <br />Staff recommends for denial. <br />Ewy asks about the dash line we see just inboard of the pergola. Is that the actual setback line <br />for scale, in terms of what we're looking at? There is a 20' dimension along the side yard for a <br />house location. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.