My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 11 21
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 11 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:19 PM
Creation date
12/2/2016 2:09:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2016 11 21
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
276
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 17, 2016 <br />Page 9 of 19 <br />I live on the property. When Randy Luallin sold the property, we knew this was going to happen. <br />In consideration, I would with this process and for the people who are living there, could we <br />have enough time to relocate. We have invested our time and our lives into this property. I am a <br />contractor and have worked in Boulder County and with the Boulder Historical Society. This <br />property has some historical significance. I am a Boulder native and I grew up with creek paths. <br />I hope there can be connections to the bike path and perhaps a bridge over the tracks to <br />Community Park. <br />Zuccaro says these are great comments. There will be several PC and CC hearings on this for <br />preliminary and final. Because this is HPC, they are focusing their review on character issues <br />related to historic preservation. The other site planning comments should be brought to Staff or <br />come to the public hearings. <br />Chuck Thomas says the types of issues you are talking about are more PC issues, who <br />recommend decisions to CC. We will be reviewing it but we do not make decisions. <br />Public Comment Against: None. <br />Closed Public Hearing and Discussion by Commission: <br />Stewart says this property really is a gateway to Old Town Louisville. It is not a gateway to New <br />Town Louisville. In that respect, I would want the architectural character of the buildings to <br />reflect Old Town architectural character in terms of size, massing, and scale. I think the <br />attached dwellings are a little out of character, so I wonder if there is flexibility. I am particularly <br />concerned about the one facing east on East Street, because those will be visually prominent in <br />driving down the road when entering Louisville. On the east side of the road is the Mayhoffer <br />Farm which is a centennial farm. I would want the buildings to have that kind of architectural <br />character. I like the detached sidewalk and front porches facing east. I do have concerns about <br />the open space looking too new town-ish and I would want to see something more appropriate <br />for a gateway to Old Town as opposed to something that looks like McCaslin Blvd. This is early <br />in the concept stages, but those are my comments. The last thing I'd like to see in that space is <br />a detention area because there is nothing that says, "This is a brand new development" more <br />than a detention pond in front of a building. <br />Haley asks Stewart would you like straighter lines to keep the trail more "Old Town"? <br />Stewart says the trail is important and the connection to the open space system. <br />Fahey says the front porches facing Highway 42 will be a lovely old town kind of feel. <br />Haley says I appreciate the lower density which will help in the massing as you approach <br />Louisville. I like the trail idea and having a pedestrian trail. It acts as a buffer between the <br />housing and the highway. <br />Chuck Thomas asks Stewart are you suggesting separating the East Street buildings into two <br />and three residences instead of four and five to preserve sight line? <br />Stewart says I think it is particularly relevant to the buildings facing East Street. I am not sure <br />the ones behind them make much difference. Ideally for me, they would be all single family <br />residences with a little bit of space between. <br />Chuck Thomas says I understand why the developer wants to do townhouses. You could <br />somewhat emulate that aesthetic by having fewer stacked next to each other, seeing twos and <br />threes rather than fours and fives. <br />Stewart says a lot of that can be achieved with massing and building forms themselves that <br />look like individual buildings even if they are attached. <br />Fahey says perhaps the front walls can be staggered. You'd have more privacy on your porch. <br />Hartronft says those comments are good. We see this as a something to reflect Louisville <br />character, but the character is changing as we move forward. I think we can come up with <br />something that will have a scale and texture that will relate to Old Town. We are asking to put <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.