My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 11 21
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 11 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:19 PM
Creation date
12/2/2016 2:09:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2016 11 21
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
276
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 17, 2016 <br />Page 16 of 19 <br />Cyndi Thomas <br />Yes <br />Chuck Thomas <br />Yes <br />Motion passed/failed: <br />Pass <br />Motion passes 5-0. <br />GRANT <br />Chuck Thomas says this is a unique structure. It is not a residential structure that we would <br />normally review in that the number of stories is typically 1.5 stories. Originally, this was used as <br />a commercial structure on Main Street. I am suggesting that we consider this a commercial <br />structure or hybrid and recommend a grant of $80,080 with a match. <br />Trice says the HPC is making a recommendation to CC. We would need to reconfigure the <br />numbers to take out the permits. You can rephrase the resolution to be an amount minus the <br />permits or amend it. <br />Chuck Thomas says the clarification is that it is subject to the standard procedures which <br />include removal of the permits, subject to further revisions as necessary to make it comply as a <br />commercial structure. <br />Haley says will the grant be just for the foundation and window? <br />Flexible Grants <br />Limited to a maximum grant amount of $5,000 <br />"Sensitive upgrading of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems" "restoration of a <br />property to a specific significant point in its history" <br />o Appurtenances - $4,870 <br />o Doors and windows - $5,000 (only includes new windows and doors) <br />o Mechanical systems - $12,000 <br />o Electrical systems - $4,720 <br />TOTAL - $26,590 (max $5,000) <br />Focused Grants <br />"Sustaining the existing form, integrity, and material of a historic property" <br />Limited to a total of $15,000 with a match of $15,000 <br />o Site grading and drainage —$3,000 <br />o Foundation — $64,000 <br />o Structural systems — $18,220 <br />o Exterior walls — $12,960 <br />o Envelope —Roofing - $4,200 <br />o Envelope — Insulation - $5,403 <br />o Doors and Windows - $7,500 (only includes repair of existing) <br />TOTAL - $115,283 (max $15,000) <br />Trice says the above shows grants for a typical residential property with the flexible grant <br />limited to $5,000 and the focused grant limited to $15,000 with the match. The permits are <br />$4,100 so that can be subtracted to $156,000, and 50% is $78,000. Once you get to Section <br />7(b) of Resolution 02, Series 2016, if it is eligible for funding, you don't have the $5,000 and <br />$15,000 limits, as long as it meets the 100% match and the extraordinary circumstances. <br />Cyndi Thomas says the extraordinary circumstances are the foundation because they will have <br />to hoist this house to save it, and that historically, it was commercial. <br />Chuck Thomas says they are restoring the original openings. It is extraordinary due to the size <br />of the property. If our rationale is including it under commercial, the flexible grant number and <br />the focused grant number do not apply. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.