My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 12 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2004-2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 12 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:20:27 AM
Creation date
12/20/2016 9:37:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RCPKT 2016 12 12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the sites. The final study shall include a ranking of site alternatives based on the combined <br />factors of cost / benefit, number of stalls and zoning compatibility. <br />Operations: While the City and our partners will be working together to identify the size and <br />best location for the parking garage, it is anticipated that the City would be responsible for the <br />long term operations and management of the facility. The feasibility plan needs to include a <br />comparison analysis of the pro's and con's of operating and maintaining the facility with City <br />resources or by out sourcing to a private company. This analysis should address long term labor <br />costs including staffing, enforcement, and property / facility maintenance. <br />Comparaison Matrix: A matrix shall be prepared that compares the constructability factors of <br />each site which includes: minimum number of parking spaces, private property impacts, adjacent <br />land uses, level of permitting difficulty, potential access points, cost factors, and some type of <br />ranking or prioritization scale. <br />Recommendation: A conclusion and recommendations on next steps to move the project forward <br />should be included in the final report including but not limited to: identifying level of effort <br />needed to successfully implement a parking garage program and estimated costs for design, <br />permitting, environmental, land acquisition and construction phases. Include as an element to <br />the report, an all-inclusive cost per stall estimate for the garage alternatives. <br />Parking Garage Feasibility Study ILA AB 2015-46.docx 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.