My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2016 12 14
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD
>
2000-2019 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2016 12 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 8:21:25 AM
Creation date
12/20/2016 9:38:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
OSABPKT 2016 12 14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />November 9th 2016 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />A. Laura attended the PPLAB (new Parks Board) meeting on October 10, 2016. <br />She reported on her notes from the meeting. Laura reported that PPLAB members are <br />working on a grading sheet for the City's Parks. Missy commented they may want to <br />see other entities' versions of the same exercise and she could forward this information <br />to Ember to pass along to them. Laura shared that PPLAB was skeptical of converting <br />Walnut Park Open Space, currently zoned as a Park, to Open Space, being concerned <br />that such a designation was very difficult to reverse. They did want it to be continued to <br />be managed as an Open Space, as it is now. The summation was: "if it ain't broke, don't <br />fix it." They reiterated their feeling that the public, particularly the immediate neighbors, <br />should be engaged if a land use designation change is ever formally proposed. They <br />nominated PPLAB member Mike Frontczak to work on a Dog Issues Tiger Team with <br />OSAB member Mike Schantz. Laura promised to get them in touch. Finally, Laura <br />reported that PPLAB decided to have OSAB's agenda at each of their monthly meetings <br />so they could decide each month whether to send a PPLAB member as a liaison to the <br />OSAB meeting. <br />B. Linda (and Helen) attended the Mayhoffer Property public meeting at the Rec <br />Center last week and she reported on her impressions. She estimated that there were <br />at least 200 members of the public there. The developer for the proposed "Kerr Estates" <br />at the property was presenting. Linda summarized that many attendees seemed irate <br />that this was the first time they had heard about the negotiations over the fate of the <br />land, and they felt "ambushed" by this "done deal." The developer wants to subdivide <br />the land into 5 estates and leave a sliver for fracking. Ember passed out a memo from <br />the Boulder County Commissioners and a fact sheet from the City of Louisville that each <br />summarized the entities' positions. <br />Mike pointed out that this land has been consistently identified as the number <br />one acquisition target by OSAB for well over a decade and the City Council knows how <br />OSAB feels about this parcel. David Belin (Lafayette Open Space Advisory Committee) <br />reported this land has been ranked as Lafayette's second highest acquisition priority a <br />similarly long time and their body met and reiterated that sentiment just last week as a <br />result of the Kerr Estates announcement. <br />Chris felt that this development proposal is probably a "fake threat." He thought <br />that without water and sewer from the City, this development can't work as proposed. <br />Chris suggested the County should not be manipulated into over -paying for the land, <br />since this proposal is probably flawed. Missy read the County Commissioner's <br />communication and felt like it helped her understand the facts. She asked Linda about <br />the general sentiment in the public meeting. Linda's impression was that the public <br />really, really wants the land to become Open Space. Ember reported that the City <br />Manager also attended the meeting and conveyed to the public that the City (and <br />partners) had made a good, fair offer for the land that had been rejected, and that they <br />didn't want to over -pay for the land as it sets a bad precedent for future landowners to <br />potentially exploit the County/Cities. Mike cautioned that it is hard for the Cities and the <br />County to negotiate for the land "in public." Lynn (LOSAC) agreed that it might be best <br />to give the government "space" to do the job. Ember clarified for Chris that the City of <br />Louisville is taking the formal lead on negotiations, with heavy support from the County. <br />VII. Public Comments on Items Not on the Agenda - <br />A. none <br />VIII. Discussion Item: Brief Louisville & Lafayette Open Space Program <br />Overview (acreage, staff, etc.) — Presented by: Ember & Rob Burdine <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.