My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 12 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2016 12 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:19 PM
Creation date
12/20/2016 10:11:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2016 12 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 21, 2016 <br />Page 10 of 20 <br />there is enough differentiation from my point of view. The design is entirely acceptable as <br />meeting the criteria to be different enough so that it differentiates from the original structure. <br />Haley asks what the material of the siding on the new construction. Will it be wider than the <br />original siding? <br />Johnson says the siding will be fibrous cement and be a 3" exposure. It will be similar but <br />wider. The original siding is 2" to 21/4". <br />Haley says the siding would be a simple way to see difference between the original and new. <br />Johnson says there will be differentiation from the material standpoint. Looking at it from a full <br />picture perspective, one of the unique things is all materials are not presented in one elevation. <br />Just focusing on the material alone is limiting. <br />Haley says one of our criteria is material differentiation between the original and new addition. <br />Cyndi Thomas says a previously approved proposal was a two-story front building. This <br />proposal is a single story with an off -set addition and garage. <br />Fahey says I am okay with the differences that exist. I wonder about the railing on the top. I like <br />it going back to the original style of windows and doors on the front facade. <br />Koertje says I understand the point about similaritie !ut the addition is differentiated enough <br />because it is two stories and because of the gars' or. <br />Public Comment in Favor: None. <br />Public Comment Against: None. <br />Closed Public Hearing and Discussion by Commission: <br />Chuck Thomas makes a motion to ap <br />10, Series 2016, a resolution making fin <br />designation for a historical r - idential stru <br />Fahey. Roll call vote. <br />coln A - Landmark, Resolution No. <br />regarding the landmark <br />Lin•+In Avenue, seconded by <br />Motion passes 5-0. <br />Fahey makes a motion to approve 625 Lincoln Avenue Alteration Certificate, <br />Resolution No. 11, Series 2016, a resolution approving an alteration certificate for the Gorce <br />House located at 625 Lincoln Avenue for exterior alterations and a rear addition, <br />seconded by Chuck Thomas. Roll call vote. <br />Name <br />Vote <br />Lynda Haley <br />Yes <br />Debbie Fahey <br />Yes <br />Peter Stewart <br />n/a <br />Mike Koertje <br />Yes <br />Jessica Fasick <br />n/a <br />Cyndi Thomas <br />Yes <br />Chuck Thomas <br />Yes <br />Motion passed/failed: <br />Pass <br />Motion passes 5-0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).