Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 6, 2016 <br />Page 7 of 15 <br />Councilmember Leh said it doesn't make sense to only adopt part of the Plan; it likewise <br />doesn't make sense to keep amending the Plan over and over. The residents aren't in <br />so much of a hurry to pass this when important information could still be added to make <br />a better decision. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton made a motion to direct staff to bring back a plan at the next <br />meeting to approve the east side of the Small Area Pian and continue work on the west <br />side. Councilmember Keany seconded the motion. Director Zuccaro stated it would be <br />difficult to adopt a Plan that bifurcates the background information. Mayor Pro Tem <br />Lipton withdrew the motion. <br />Mayor Muckle asked if it would be possible to adopt the Plan and include language that <br />the west side of McCaslin Boulevard will be reevaluated. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated he would like a Plan for the whole area, not have one <br />broken up in pieces. <br />Councilmember Leh made a motion to put the Plan on hold until after there can be a <br />study session to which the public, landowners, and developers have all been invited to <br />give input. He would like to delay any vote on the Plan until more information is <br />gathered. Mayor Pro Tem Lipton seconded but stated it may require more time than just <br />one study session. He would like it continued without the study session limitation. He <br />made a friendly amendment to continue it until staff can bring it back with additional <br />information. Attorney Light noted Council cannot have substantive discussion or give <br />direction at a study session, for more flexibility it should be continued to a meeting <br />(regular or special) for discussion/direction. <br />Mayor Muckle made an intervening motion to continue to the meeting of January 17. <br />Seconded by Councilmember Keany. Councilmember Maloney offered a friendly <br />amendment that height and setback limits be addressed at the next meeting. Mayor <br />Muckle stated at the next meeting he would also like more information on Transit - <br />Oriented Development. <br />Attorney Light asked if there were any objections to acting on the intervening motion <br />first. No objections. A vote was taken and all were in favor of continuing the Plan until <br />January 17th. <br />Director Zuccaro asked what items Council would like covered on January 17th <br />Members stated they would like to see Transit -Oriented Development principals and <br />language and input from public and property owners about what would be beneficial to <br />development of the business park. <br />721 GRANT AVENUE LANDMARK & PRESERVATION GRANT <br />