My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2016 12 21
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2016 12 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:03:13 PM
Creation date
12/30/2016 11:52:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOAPKT 2016 12 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 16, 2016 <br />Page 12 of 12 <br />building permit because the Building Department would have to approve the floodproofing <br />methods. <br />Zuccaro says the BOA can put into the condition "prior to issuance of the building permit", it <br />would take place. That would provide the most flexibility. <br />DeJong says how about prior to the building permit application. <br />Zuccaro says either prior to or at the same time as submittal of the building permit <br />application. <br />Meseck asks how the other Board members think about this suggestion. If there is language <br />that stated #1, that the BOA requires floodproofing methods be submitted prior to building <br />permit application" and "that we get stamped certification from a registered professional <br />engineer or architect", where do the other members stand? <br />Campbell says I am leaning toward denial. <br />Meseck says would it be a barrier to the proposal to require the floodproofing methods? <br />Gorsevski says I don't think it would be a barrier. Because that process is more restrictive, I <br />think I could be comfortable with it. I would vote to approve without the contingency and <br />therefore, I think it would be inconsistent to hold it up. <br />Stuart says I prefer to not do the second contingency. <br />Gorsevski makes motion to approve 826 Coal Creek Circle — Floodplain Development <br />Permit — Request for a Floodplain Development Permit to Construct a 40,000 Square -Foot <br />Building Addition in the Flood Regulatory District Case #16 -033 -FL, with the contingent <br />1. that the applicant provide to City Staff for their review a stamped and certified copy of <br />the analysis included as part o '` ~ pplication b gistered professional engineer, <br />seconded by Stuart, Roll call vote. <br />Name <br />Andrew Meseck <br />James Stuart <br />Leslie Ewy <br />Gunnar Malmquist <br />Thomas DeJong <br />Lowell Campbell <br />Alison Gorsevski <br />Vote <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />n/ <br />0 <br />es <br />Motion passed/failed: <br />Motion passes 3-2. <br />Busin s ely duled for December 21, 2016: None. <br />Staff Comments: <br />Zuccaro says the three pons ar ®r renewal. Applications are due November 15, 2016 and <br />applicant review. There are y applicants for many positions. At this time, Gunnar <br />Malmquist a• • ' Ilison Go r- ski are not seeking reappointment. <br />Board Commen <br />Discussion Items for December 21, 2016 Meeting: None at this time. <br />Adjourn: <br />Stuart moved and DeJong seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. Motion passed <br />unanimously by voice vote. Meeting adjourned at 7:56 pm. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.