My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1992 02 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1992 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1992 02 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:34 PM
Creation date
7/28/2005 11:12:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/18/1992
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1992 02 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Franklin: <br /> <br />Lathrop: <br /> <br />Franklin: <br /> <br />Lathrop: <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />Susan: <br /> <br />That's correct. Boxelder runs <br />towards the west end of the property <br />and there is water and sewer in <br />there. There is, also, water and <br />sewer that runs up the west line. <br /> <br />Is Mr. Mattern here? <br /> <br />His daughter normally represents Mr. <br />Mattern, but she's not here. <br /> <br />If the applicant is not here, I am <br />not comfortable acting on it. I <br />have a question for the applicant <br />and there isn't anyone to answer it. <br /> <br />Susan, is it possible to grant "RR" <br />zoning, but make as part of the <br />annexation agreement only two <br />residences are required and, <br />therefore, the owner would not have <br />a use by right to subdivide? <br /> <br />The better approach would be to <br />grant the more restricted zoning and <br />specifically permit, through the <br />annexation agreement, the <br />replacement of the mobile home. The <br />other approach would be more <br />difficult to justify. <br /> <br />Sisk moved that Council place Ordinance No. 1067, Series 1992, out <br />for publication and set a public hearing for April 7, 1992, <br />providing that the restricted zoning, which is "RR", be imposed, <br />and if someone is not present representing the Matterns, he'll be <br />inclined not to vote for it. <br /> <br />Davidson and Hornbostel questioned the "RR" zoning. <br /> <br />Griffiths asked Mr. Franklin that if Council followed the more <br />restricted zoning category and add to that, which would allow the <br />one residence, and add to that an annexation agreement with the <br />special exception to replace the mobile home. What would be the <br />proper zoning category to permit that? <br /> <br />Franklin: <br /> <br />The "RR" was picked, because it <br />would allow that. The Agricultural <br />zoning would allow more units per <br />five acres. I think the <br />Agricultural is the most restrictive <br />with the stipulations that Council <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.