Laserfiche WebLink
adjusted because of the easement <br />problem? <br /> <br />Allenbaugh: <br /> <br />They were asking quite a bit more <br />than I paid for it. <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />It would be fair to say that you <br />were aware of the impediments that <br />we're addressing three years later. <br /> <br />Allenbaugh: <br /> <br />The only thing I was aware of was <br />that the easement was not recorded. <br />The bike path was mentioned in every <br />document I could find, both from the <br />City and the easement that was never <br />recorded. John Franklin assured me <br />that all I needed was signs. <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />I am unwilling to make a decision <br />based on what I see here to be the <br />facts. We have a land locked piece <br />of property. You purchased the <br />property to your benefit, because <br />there were some impediments in title <br />and now Council is putting the path, <br />which is a well used bike path, at <br />risk. It concerns me that it's a <br />land locked piece of property. <br /> <br />Don Shonkwiler, 538 W. Ash Court, Louisville, CO. stated that he <br />was on the Planning Commission when this subdivision was approved <br />and he gave a some historical context. The Planning Commission did <br />not approve the subdivision on first reading, because Mr. Houseman <br />did not have appropriate access that was appropriate to a single <br />family home. We suggested that he talk to McStain Enterprises and <br />secure different access to that property that would not have to <br />proceed along the bike path for several hundred feet, cross a <br />drainage area, and really be an impediment to the bike path. He <br />did secure an easement across the bike path access to Sycamore <br />Street. It was clearly the intent of Planning Commission and <br />Council, at that time, to approve the subdivision with the clear <br />intent of securing the access to the property across McStain <br />Enterprises' Sundance subdivision. He recalled that the <br />subdivision was delayed until that access and easement could be <br />secured with McStain and could be approved and worked out with the <br />City of Louisville. So, that land, which is for a single family <br />home and has City water and sewer service stubbed to the property <br />through the McStain subdivision not through Pulte Homes, could have <br />a single family house. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />Has the Sundance subdivision PUD <br />been reviewed for any information? <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br /> <br />