Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 7, 2017 <br />Page 8 of 15 <br />Bob Perkins, 405 Fairfield Lane, agreed with earlier speakers He asked the Council <br />why residential is being considered again in the Plan. He doesn't support any more <br />residential in Louisville. <br />Cindy Bedell, 662 West Willow Street, thanked the Council for removing residential from <br />the east side of McCaslin Boulevard. She encouraged the Council to consider livability <br />and small town character in the Plan. She doesn't support any height changes to the <br />buildings in the Plan or any residential on Centennial Parkway. She doesn't feel TOD <br />will work in this area. We need the tax revenue from the area, not residential. <br />Audrey Debarros, 839 West Mulberry Street, stated the TOD at the McCaslin Station <br />would be a benefit to the community and multimodal activity in this area is viable in this <br />area of town. She noted that much of the conversation has not been inclusive or <br />welcoming If Louisville doesn't take advantage of opportunities to attract the private <br />sector, our neighbors will We have to be more inclusive to the changing demographics <br />She encouraged innovation and flexibility in the corridor. <br />RJ Harrington, 457 East Raintree Court, agreed with the previous speaker. There is no <br />guarantee the existing uses in the area will stay forever so we need options for the <br />future. Open spaces can be preserved by putting density in this area through the TOD <br />Affordable housing could be suggested through the Special Review Use option in the <br />future. Inclusivity is very important. He asked what does population control look like and <br />how does it affect us all. <br />Sherry Sommer, 910 South Palisade Court, stated she is not in principle opposed to <br />Transit Oriented Development but the implementation and these ideals are too far apart <br />for this area and she doesn't think it will work in Louisville We do need a population <br />target and need to think about affordability for a diverse population. <br />Charles Haseman, 247 South Lark Avenue, stated he doesn't support reducing the <br />lanes on Centennial Parkway as it subsidizes parking for the developer. He stated the <br />TOD area isn't being integrated into the community with no transit connections to <br />downtown. That area is not knitted into the rest of Louisville well. We need the tax <br />dollars from retail and sales, not more residential. <br />Carlos Hernandez, 279 Chestnut Street, stated his support for high-density housing in <br />Louisville. It is affordable and is what allowed him to save and later buy a house. He <br />stated the conversation of limiting options and not allowing new residents are not good <br />for the community. He noted change is hard and reminded people that all the houses <br />people live in now are in areas that were once open spaces and were controversial <br />when first proposed We need to advocate for the future and for the face of others in <br />town. <br />