My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2017 03 14 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2017 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2017 03 14 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:13:59 PM
Creation date
4/5/2017 10:23:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2017 03 14 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 14, 2017 <br />Page 6 of 8 <br />• Totaling $350,297 and an additional $26,797 for FICA for an estimated grand <br />total of $377,094 annually in 2018 and subsequent years. <br />Councilmember Loo asked if we change the list of cities in the salary survey how much <br />does it affect the numbers. Director Hix stated it would affect the numbers and it would <br />depend on who we added to the mix. <br />Councilmember Leh noted where we get our employees geographically. He asked if we <br />we lose employees to Boulder9 Director Hix stated we lose some but not a lot We also <br />lose to Westminster as they have a four day per week schedule. Leh asked if we add <br />these two cities will it raise the numbers. Director Hix stated it will raise them <br />incrementally. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann would prefer to use a pay philosophy rather than using <br />these options which feel like artificial manipulations. Director Hix noted adding cities in <br />Boulder County to the mix is one way to compete with the other cities in Boulder <br />County. <br />Deputy Manager Balser noted staff is trying to understand what compensation <br />philosophy Council wants staff to implement and what Council's goals are for this issue. <br />Is it a livable wage, addressing low wage employees, benefits, etc. <br />Option 5: Change benefit eligibility (health, dental, vision, 401 K, PLB, EIB, etc.) for <br />employees who work greater than 20 hours per week, on a regular basis, and continue <br />to use current Pay Philosophy and Labor Market cities for annual salary survey and <br />salary projections. Cost estimates are unavailable at this time for this option as it would <br />require renegotiating contracts with the following health care providers: Kaiser, Delta <br />Dental, VSP, Lincoln Financial, and ICMA. Health, dental and vision providers would <br />need specific numbers of employees and "census" data on those employees in order to <br />provide a cost for these services. ICMA and Lincoln Financial (life insurance) costs <br />would depend on the wage of employees and at this time, specific details are <br />unavailable. <br />Deputy Manager Balser noted the $15.67 or Self Sufficiency Standard/"living wage" is a <br />2015 number from Boulder' study. It may need to be reevaluated. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated his goal is make sure we pay full-time employees a living <br />wage. If people want to work part-time that is their choice, His concern is for those full- <br />time employees who need a living wage. He likes option 2 which would bring the full- <br />timers to $15.67. He stated for the benefit part he thinks there might be some ways to <br />give some benefits for part-time staff, perhaps at a prorated cost. He would like to see <br />more exploration for benefits for part-time employees. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated he likes a blend of Option 2 and Option 5 and lowering <br />the hours per week to qualify for benefits. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.