Laserfiche WebLink
City of Louisville Citizen Survey <br />August 2008 <br />Community characteristics that were rated more favorably in 2008 than in 2004 included ease of <br />bicycle travel in Louisville (89% said "excellent" or "good" in 2008 versus 79% in 2004), ease of car <br />travel in Louisville (88% versus 76%), air quality (87% versus 79%), sense of community (82% <br />versus 76%), traffic flow on major streets (78% "excellent" or "good" versus 61% "minor problem" <br />or "not a problem' and opportunities to attend cultural activities (60% versus 49%). Shopping <br />opportunities received lower ratings in 2008 than in 2004 (46% rated as "good" or better in 2008 <br />versus 60% in 2004). Please note that differences in ratings between 2008 and 2004 may be at least <br />partially attributable to changes in question characteristics. See Appendix E: Comparison of~uestion <br />Characteristics by Year for detailed notes on question differences across years. <br />Table 3: Community Characteristics Compared by Year <br />Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Percent "excellent" or "good"* <br />Louisville as a whole: 2008 ' 2004 1994 1990 <br />Overall image or reputation of Louisville <br />Ease of walking in Louisville <br />Overall appearance of Louisville <br />Ease of bicycle travel in Louisville <br />Ease of car travel in Louisville <br />..Air quality <br />Quality of overall natural environment in Louisville <br />Recreational opportunities <br />Overall lighting in the City <br />Sense of community <br />Availability of preventive health services <br />Traffic flow on maior streets <br />95 <br />NA ', NA NA <br />90% ' <br />__ 88% NA <br />_ NA <br />_ <br />89% 85% NA <br />_ <br />_ NA <br />89% 79% NA ' NA <br />88%° _76% NA NA. <br />87% 79% 84% 84% <br />87% NA NA NA <br />85% 80% NA <br />_. NA <br />83% 82% 75% NA <br />82% 76% NA NA <br />Opportunities to volunteer <br />Opportunities to participate in community matters <br />Opportunities to participate in social events and activities <br />Availability of affordable quality food <br />Openness and acceptance of the community towards people of <br />diverse backgrounds <br />Ease of bus travel in Louisville <br />__ ___ <br />Variety of housing options <br />_ __ <br />Opportunities to attend cultural activities <br />Availability of affordable quality child care <br />Shopping opportunities........ _ __ __ <br />73 <br />71% <br />NA ' NA ' NA <br />61 % NA NA <br />_ <br />NA 27% NA <br />_ <br />NA 40% NA <br />_ <br />NA 79% NA <br />69% NA NA <br />67% ' 68% ! NA <br />67% 62% NA <br />_ <br />61% NA __ <br />NA <br />60% 49% 41 %° <br />50% ' S0% <br />46% 60% <br />Availability of affordable quality housing 39% ' 30% <br />__ __ <br />Employment opportunities 33% ' 25% <br />NA <br />NA <br />32% <br />NA <br />NA <br />NA <br />NA <br />NA <br />NA <br />NA <br />NA <br />NA <br />*Some question characteristics (i.e., question wording and scale) changed between survey years. To see the comparison <br />of question wording across all survey years, see Appendix E: Comparison of Question Characteristics by Year. These <br />questions were not asked in 1999. <br />Residents age 18 to 34 were more likely to give positive ratings to the availability of affordable <br />quality housing than were those ages 35 and older. Those living in Louisville for more than 10 years <br />were less likely to give favorable ratings to the availability of affordable quality housing than were <br />residents who had lived in the city for a shorter period of time. Female residents felt a greater sense <br />of community than did male residents. See ~(ppendix C.• Comparison of Responses by Respondent <br />Demographics for more information about crosstabulations of survey results. <br />80% <br />78 <br />77% <br />c <br />c <br />U <br />..c <br />U <br />4J <br />r= <br />0 <br />.~ <br />z <br />0 <br />0 <br />N <br />O <br />Report of Results <br />12 <br />