My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2008 08 12
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2001-2009 City Council Study Sessions
>
2008 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2008 08 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:36:18 AM
Creation date
9/12/2008 11:54:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
5F6
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2008 08 12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />August 12, 2008 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br />the City's cost is estimated at $1.3 million and the rest of the cost would <br />come from Federal funds and CDOT. Mayor Sisk asked if the work would <br />be done during off hours. Public Works Director Tom Phare said that <br />there would probably be lane restrictions so as not to slow done the <br />project. <br /> <br />5. UpdatelDiscussion - Revenue Stability - <br />City Manager Fleming gave a brief introduction about the Revenue Stability <br />Workgroup. He said that they have a resolution that the consortium has agreed <br />upon which would result in a City that is developing retail would keep 60% of the <br />sales tax generated and 40% would be split with the other cities in the <br />consortium. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Sheri Marsella who also is a member of the workgroup said that <br />she felt it was a step back and that she was hoping for a more concrete and <br />comprehensive plan. Her concern is that this will involve more side agreements <br />between neighboring communities. Mayor Pro Tem Marsella said that she does <br />agree with the points of the plan. <br /> <br />Councilor Sackett stated that it was ok not to come up with something <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk stated that his understanding was that all the cities in the consortium <br />had agreed with the resolution and if the plan was changed then the risk would <br />be that some of the cities would drop out of the plan. <br /> <br />City Manager Fleming stated that if the plan works and is followed by the cities <br />along the Front Range and/or the state then it would be more beneficial. Mayor <br />Pro Tem Marsella agreed that the plan would be better if the area was bigger. <br /> <br />6. City Manager Items- <br />City Manager Fleming referred to the Advance Agenda. City Manager Fleming <br />pointed out the Special Budget Meeting scheduled for October 2nd. Councilor <br />Frost Yarnell and David Clabots said that the date conflicted with Boards that <br />were liaisons to. City Manager Fleming said that they would check October 1st to <br />see if that would be a better date to hold the meeting. <br /> <br />Councilor Bob Muckle asked about the Energy Home Audits. Assistant City <br />Manager Balser said that the City had done the energy home audits but that <br />there was a waiting list and Boulder County offered 19 more audits for $2500, <br />which would allow audits for the people on the wait list. Assistant City Manager <br />Balser stated that next year the Audit cost would increase so the City Manager <br />felt it was a good use of the money in the City's reserves. <br /> <br />Councilor Muckle asked about the Renewable Energy resolution on the Advance <br />Agenda. Assistant City Manager Balser said that it was a resolution related to <br />House Bill 08-1350 and would allow the City to be a participate in Boulder <br />County's financing programs for renewable energy and energy efficiency capital <br />improvement projects. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.