Laserfiche WebLink
SUBJECT: DOWNTOWN PARKING IMPROVEMENT FEE <br />DATE: MAY 9, 2017 <br />PAGE 4 OF 7 <br />Parking lots require ongoing maintenance. This includes: surface repairs, lighting, <br />plowing, enforcement, and administration. Assuming annual maintenance costs are <br />10% of construction costs ($250 per year), the net present value of 20 years of <br />maintenance costs discounted by the City's cost of borrowing (4%), would be $3,400. <br />In summary, assuming the above analysis, the real estate cost, construction and <br />ongoing operating cost for a new surface space in the downtown area today is: <br />Land Cost per space = <br />Construction cost per space = <br />NPV of Ongoing Operations and Maintenance = <br />Total cost per space = <br />$16,000 <br />$ 2,500 <br />$ 3,400 <br />$21,900 <br />Community benefits of making the Parking Improvement Fee available <br />Providing an opportunity for new developments to pay a parking improvement fee <br />instead of constructing private parking on their property has community and developer <br />benefits. Donald Shoup, author of "The High Cost of Free Parking", is a planning <br />professor at UCLA and published an article titled "Instead of Free Parking". Shoup, <br />through review of 46 cities with in -lieu parking programs, notes several benefits of a <br />Parking Improvement Fee program. <br />1. An Option. In -lieu fees give developers an alternative to meeting parking <br />requirements on sites where providing all the required spaces would be difficult <br />or extremely expensive. <br />2. Shared Parking. Public parking spaces allow shared use among different sites <br />whose peak parking demands occur at different times. Shared public parking is <br />more efficient than single -use private parking because fewer spaces are needed <br />to meet the total peak parking demand. Parking that is shared among different <br />establishments also allows motorists to park once and visit multiple sites on foot. <br />3. Better Design. Cities can put public parking lots and structures where they do not <br />deter vehicle and pedestrian circulation. Less on-site parking allows continuous <br />storefronts without dead gaps for adjacent surface parking lots. To improve the <br />streetscape, some cities dedicate the first floor of public parking structures to <br />retail use. Developers can undertake infill projects without assembling large sites <br />to accommodate on-site parking, and architects have greater freedom to design <br />better buildings in a more pedestrian -friendly environment. <br />4. Fewer Variances. Developers often request variances from parking <br />requirements. These variances create unearned economic windfalls, granted to <br />some developers but denied to others. If developers can pay cash rather than <br />provide the required parking, cities do not need to grant parking variances and <br />COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />