Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />February 3, 2004 <br />Page 6 of 8 <br /> <br />available at the Louisville Library for citizens who cannot come to the City Clerk's office <br />during business hours. She also requested that citizens be allowed to sign up to receive <br />City Council e-mails. <br /> <br />Susan Morris, 939 W. Maple Court, Louisville, CO, congratulated Council on their <br />proposal to permit citizens to access Council e-mails. She stated she would also like to <br />review FYI e-mails reporting on DRCOG and other governmental agency meetings, and <br />on discussions at Ward meetings. <br /> <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br /> <br />Council member Van Pelt asked if open records e-mails could be reached electronically <br />through the Web Site. Deputy City Manager Boyd stated the City is investigating <br />electronic delivery, however at this time, the City does not have the technology. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Keany supported a second copy of the e-mails at the Library. He asked <br />how soon Council could expect to have the separate e-mail setup. Deputy City Manager <br />Boyd estimated its availability by the end of the week. <br /> <br />Marsella asked for clarification on whether it is appropriate to send a copy of any <br />communication to m6re than one Council member to open records. City Attorney Light <br />reviewed the correspondence rule for elected officials public records: The exceptions are <br />if e-mails do not involve public business or public money. He noted Council would not <br />want to discourage a citizen who might seek confidentiality, from contacting their <br />representative. He explained there is a provision in the Open Records Act, which applies <br />to situations where the constituents have an expectation of confidentiality and in those <br />cases, Council members would consult with the City Clerk to determine if that exception <br />applies. Light addressed the exception of work product, which is protected by another <br />privilege and could be discussed and determined by Staff. <br /> <br />Council member Brown asked City Attorney Light to address e-mails and the open <br />meetings law. City Attorney Light explained the open meeting rule: Whenever the <br />majority of the City Council is expected to meet to discuss business, public notice is <br />required. The problem with the formal notice requirement on e-mail meetings is a <br />member may not be aware the e-mail has been sent. Some municipalities post Web Site <br />advisements that those types of discussions do occur, and rely on that as notice. <br /> <br />Council discussion: Brown agreed e-mail' discussion could prompt a meeting notice. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Keany commented FYI (For Your Information) e-mails should be copied <br />to open records. Mayor Sisk stressed the Council should not be dissuaded from using e- <br />mails as a method of communication. He thanked Staff for working so quickly on this <br />matter and stated he looks forward to a working model. <br /> <br />John Leary 1116 LaFarge Avenue, Louisville, CO asked for clarification on why open <br />records e-mails could not be placed on the Web Page in electronic format. <br /> <br /> <br />