Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2017 08 16

Home Browse Search

roughly 12%, as noted in the comparison lot coverage discussion above. Additionally, staff notes that the home to the west is much shallower in comparison to the subject property, and the proposed addition will increase the visual impact of the subject home from the west neighbor. Staff finds the proposal does not meet this criterion. 6. That the variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that will afford relief and is the least modification possible of the provisions of Title 17 of the Louisville Municipal Code that is in question. Staff finds that the request is the minimum variance that will afford relief. The proposed addition design is logical and meets the needs identified by the applicant to remain in the home. Staff finds the proposal meets this criterion. PUBLIC COMMENTS: To date, no public comments have been received. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds all applicable variance criteria in Section 17.48.110 of the LMC have not been met and therefore recommends denial of the variance request. BOARD ACTION: The Board may approve (with or without condition or modification), deny, or continue the application to a future meeting for additional consideration. The Board may also request additional information if they feel it is needed for their proper consideration of the variance application. In approving an application, the Board must find that all six variance criteria, insofar as applicable, have been met. The Board should adopt specific findings for each review criterion in support of any motion. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application 2. Site Plan 3. Support letters 7