My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2017 08 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2017 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2017 08 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:03:13 PM
Creation date
8/24/2017 12:47:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOAPKT 2017 08 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 19, 2017 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />DeJong reviewed the procedures for the meeting; opened the public hearing; and <br />stated there are six criteria which must be met for the board to approve a variance <br />request. <br />DeJong stated that for the requested variance to be approved, four (4) of the five (5) <br />votes would need to be affirmative. <br />DeJong then stated copies of the criteria are located on the table next to entryway. He <br />asked for verification of proper public notice. <br />Ritchie verified the application to be heard this evening is complete, and was mailed to <br />surrounding property owners on March 31, 2017, published in the Boulder Daily Camera <br />on April 2,2017, and the property was posted on posted on March 28, 2017. <br />Williams moved and Stuart seconded a motion that all requirements have been <br />satisfied and the application submitted by the applicants has been properly filed. Motion <br />passed by unanimous voice vote. <br />DeJong asked if anyone at the hearing had any objections to the hearing procedures <br />he had described and asked if there were any other preliminary matters that needed to <br />be taken care of. None were heard. <br />Conflict of Interest and Disclosure: <br />DeJong asked for disclosures from the board members for any site visits, ex parte <br />communications, and any conflicts of interest or required disclosures on the application. <br />All Board members indicated they did not have any ex parte communications or any <br />conflicts of interest for the application. <br />Campbell did not visit the site, no ex parte contact, no conflict of interest. <br />Ewy did not visit the site, no ex parte contact, no conflict of interest. <br />Williams did not visit the site, no ex parte contact, no conflict of interest. <br />Stuart did not visit the site, no ex parte contact, no conflict of interest. <br />DeJong did not visit the site, no ex parte contact, no conflict of interest. <br />DeJong asked the applicants if they were ready to proceed with the hearing. <br />The applicants indicated they were ready to proceed with the hearing. <br />Staff Report of Facts and Issues: <br />Ritchie reviewed the location of the property, noted the lot sizes for the RE zone district and <br />summarized the proposal. <br />Staff Recommendations: <br />Staff recommends Board of Adjustment move to approve the variance request. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.