Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 15, 2017 <br />Page 11 of 13 <br />Councilmember Loo moved to approve Resolution No. 48, Senes 2017; Councilmember <br />Keany seconded the motion <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated her support for the motion and added it is hard to <br />make long-range plans for capital and maintenance so major adjustments like this aren't <br />needed in the future She would like staff to prepare a long-range plan for water rates <br />and a better understanding of what is driving the rate increases. She would like more <br />information as to why the rates have gone up so much in the last few years. We need <br />more long-range planning for preventative maintenance. <br />Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote <br />RESOLUTION NO. 49, SERIES 2017 — A RESOLUTION SETTING REVISED <br />INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER SURCHARGE RATES FOR THE CITY OF <br />LOUISVILLE, COLORADO <br />Mayor Muckle introduced the item. Director Kowar stated this is consideration of an <br />increase to the wastewater surcharge fees. As a part of our environmental permit for the <br />wastewater plant there is an Industrial Pretreatment Program (IPP) that sets discharge <br />limits for large users that may impact our wastewater treatment plant We set rates in <br />coordination with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and then we uphold those <br />rates through the IPP. What is before you are the fines we charge people who <br />discharge a high amount of solids or what are called "biological oxygen demand" and oil <br />and grease into our system. It was last updated in 1992. Staff recommends increasing <br />the fines from 25 cents to 58 cents. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked why the Utility Committee had not reviewed this Director <br />Kowar stated it is a routine item and staff felt it didn't need additional review <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated this is a doubling of the fee and we don't know what the <br />impact is; it might be a Targe impact to an industrial user. Director Kowar noted the fiscal <br />impact is an increase of about $15,000 in revenue to the City. He noted that if an <br />industrial user meets all of the discharge rules, they won't get charged anything. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated he simply would like this to be handled procedurally with a <br />review from the Utility Committee. <br />Councilmember Loo asked if industrial users had been notified of the proposed change. <br />Director Kowar stated notification had not been made; he noted only a handful of users <br />will be affected. This is a fine, not a use charge, and is used to recoup the cost of <br />treating the extra material in our wastewater system. Councilmember Loo noted those <br />who might be affected should have been told this increase was under discussion so <br />they could attend the meeting to state their concerns if they had any. <br />