My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2008 10 13 SP Joint Meeting City Council
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2004-2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2008 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2008 10 13 SP Joint Meeting City Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:17:09 AM
Creation date
10/14/2008 10:52:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RCPKT 2008 10 13 SP Joint with City Council
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Property Challenges: <br /> <br />e Uncertainty of commuter rail (no defined timing or commitment from RTD) <br />G If commuter rail does comes to this area, the rail will require up to 500+ parking <br />space (not including parking for other uses) <br />o Mid-block location along Hwy. 42 corridor-difficult for retail <br />o Open Space/parks on other side of Hwy 42 limits to single sided retail only <br />\!I Limited access until signalized at Short Street <br />o Multiple property ownerships with different objectives <br />o Current zoning limits density around rail station <br />o Noise from freight rail <br /> <br />Development Issues: <br /> <br />o Excellent site for mixed use development: Neighborhood retail, office, and <br />residential <br />o Do not have a station area development plan as counterpoint to RTD surface <br />parking plan <br /><I> Uncertainty of commuter rail, will require a two pronged approach: <br />o If commuter rail does come, how to get the type of development desired in <br />lieu of the surface parking plan currently on the table <br />III How to finance the $10 million likely necessary to pay for a <br />parking structure (s)? <br />1!11 Current Design Standards and Guidelines limit developer's ability <br />to contribute to public objectives <br />1!11 How to guide current development in the area until transit arrives <br />so it is compatible with TOn objectives <br />o If commuter rail does not come, what is the future of that area? <br />III Will there still be a need for the pedestrian underpass, internal <br />roads or signalized intersections along Hwy. 42 <br />Iii If so, who is responsible for the costs and what will be the source <br />of funding <br />o New development could compromise future land development opportunity <br />e Retail potential is likely to be limited to neighborhood retail on the site <br />\!I Current retail market is slow, if not stagnant at this time <br />\11 What other civic uses could anchor redevelopment and help rebrand this area? <br />o Development in this area is likely going to need to be a public/private partnership <br />with the City, RTD, Developers and possibly land owners <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.