My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2008 09 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2008 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2008 09 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:27 PM
Creation date
10/14/2008 4:23:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
9/2/2008
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2008 09 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 2, 2008 <br />Page 11 of 13 <br />provides for financing only and not ongoing operation of the public infrastructure. <br />He stressed the importance of a clear disclosure to prospective homebuyers <br />advising them of the Metro District and how that would affect their taxes. He <br />asked if a City Councilor could be a member of the Metro District Board. City <br />Attorney Light noted a Board Member must be a resident living within the Metro <br />District. <br />Councilor Muckle asked if the Metra District's public infrastructure would meet <br />City standards. City Attorney Light explained the Metro District does not replace <br />the City's requirements and all public improvements must be approved by the <br />City. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Marsella stated the mill levy is set at 34 mills and asked if <br />increasing the mills would require City Council approval. Mr. Brew stated it <br />would not require City Council approval however no new bonds could be issued. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Marsella asked City Attorney Light if the service plan addressed <br />his concern with the Metropolitan District. City Attorney Light stated he was <br />satisfied with the financial plan and t;he service plan. <br />Councilors Dalton and Yarnell supported the service plan. Councilor Yarnell <br />asked what would happen if the funding for the underpass and the monument <br />signage was not available. City Attorney Light stated under the service plan the <br />City is responsible for completing thE; projects. If the funds are not used by the <br />City within ten years after the bonds have been issued, the remaining funds <br />would be returned to the developer. <br />Mayor Sisk said he generally did not support Metro Districts in Colorado but <br />supported a Metro District for this particular project for several reasons. He <br />stressed the importance of complete disclosure to the homeowners. He <br />suggested 50 mills to cover all contingencies. He did not support returning the <br />funds to the developer if the projects are not completed within the ten year period <br />and asked staff to prepare an alternative. <br />MOTION: Mayor Sisk moved to continue the proposed Takoda Metro District to <br />September 16, 2008, seconded by Councilor Dalton. All in favor. <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION/ACTION -PROPOSED LOUISVILLE <br />REVITALIZATION COMMISSION (LRC) BUDGET <br />City Manager Fleming explained the submission of the 2009 Louisville <br />Revitalization Commission (LRC) budget is required for review and approval per <br />the Cooperation Agreement between the City Council and the LRC. The 2009 <br />request includes $10,000 for legal fees and $125,000 for professional services. <br />The LRC continues to anticipate utilizing professional services to assist in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.