My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1984 06 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1984 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1984 06 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:23 PM
Creation date
10/16/2008 11:56:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/5/1984
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1984 06 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6/5/84 Page -6- <br /> a:nd critical one to parts of the down- <br /> town program. In 1981 the Colorado Legis- <br /> lature changed the sales tax law to permit <br /> Statuatory Cities to ear-mark part of their <br /> existing or increased sales taxes into a <br /> Capital Improvements Fund; and from that <br />Sales Tax Revenue Bonds fund that may issue Sales Tax Revenue Bonds <br />Financing wherein they simply fund Capital Improve- <br /> ments each year. In order to start that <br /> process the City must have an ear-marked <br /> election and they were recommending that <br /> election be held in February, 1985. Be- <br /> cause of the Primary and General Election <br /> this year, February, 1985 would possibly <br /> be the earliest date that the City could <br /> hold that election. Mr. Caldwell referred <br /> to the chart and noted that Louisville's <br /> sales tax rate was far below the State <br /> average, which was 2.7%; and the average <br /> in the City's average population category <br /> is 2.875%, Mr. Caldwell advised that once <br /> the funds are earmarked for the Capital <br /> Improvements Fund, they may not be trans- <br />. ferred back into the General Fund, when <br /> a. Sales Tax Revenue Bond is issued. The <br /> money must be spent to pay off bonds or <br /> spent annually for Capital Improvements. <br /> If 40% of the proceeds are used for down- <br /> town improvements as suggested, and Council <br /> would go along with this program, they should <br /> draw a ballot question making the Capital <br /> Improvements quite broad allowing for a <br /> full range of such improvements for the City. <br /> H[e commented that the only two cities that <br /> ~rere below the state average in sales tax <br /> percentages were Louisville and Rocky Ford. <br />Phased Improvements to the Z'he next chart showed the phased improvements <br />Downtown t:o the downtown. There were 4 mechanisms <br /> c>f financing these other than cash. The. <br /> mechanisms would include a Special Improve- <br /> ment District, a General Improvement District, <br /> si General Obligation Bond, or Sales Tax <br /> F;evenue Bond. It was their suggestion to <br /> combine in the first phase a Special Improve- <br /> ment District with the merchants and the <br /> property owners and leasees being involved <br /> in taxing themselves; and a Sales Tax Revenue <br /> Bond. Phase I included parking, sidewalk <br /> improvements, and plazas. The City had con- <br /> t=ributed $567,000 in water lines. and other <br /> public works - the Special Improvement Dis- <br /> t=rict would provide $530,000 for parking. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.