My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2017 09 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2017 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2017 09 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:00 PM
Creation date
9/20/2017 9:30:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2017 09 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 5, 2017 <br />Page 12 of 18 <br />is prosecutable Chief Hayes stated the ordinance applies throughout town The <br />prosecutor has told him typically she wants a second complainant and additional <br />research. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked if CRS §25-12-103 applies to Louisville. Attorney <br />Light noted state statute regarding noise control creates a private right of action, and <br />does not automatically apply within a municipality Some municipality's say noise control <br />is a matter of local control. A local ordinance allows writing violations into the municipal <br />court Statute has language that allows a municipality to create rules no less restrictive, <br />but is not completely clear about creating more restrictive rules. <br />Councilmember Leh noted a May 11 email from Chief Hayes stating current police <br />process. The police department currently seeks voluntary compliance, education and if <br />need be, enforcement. <br />Public Comments <br />Joel Hayes, 187 Harper Street, noted an email he had sent stating with so few <br />complaints he hopes Council does not make any changes to the current ordinance. He <br />added music is an art form with intnnsic value of its own Hundreds of people who listen <br />or play music in our community should outweigh the few complaints. He played his <br />mandolin showing the live music decibel level in the proposed ordinance is too low. He <br />doesn't want to have an ordinance that would limit his ability to play an instrument in his <br />own backyard <br />Chuck Martin, 1433 North Franklin Court, stated one big value to add to the list is music <br />and arts in town There is a thriving music scene in town and has venues to play. <br />Logistically decibel levels sound good, but it would shut down the music scene in this <br />town <br />Tom Rafferty, 945 Rex Street, stated he didn't know about this discussion and would <br />like more notice about such discussions This affects many people and more notice <br />would be better Thanks for addressing Street Faire noise It has been better in the last <br />year. He noted he loves music, but can hear the music from five blocks away from <br />downtown and is super aggravated with the noise. He bought his house in 1980 and is <br />asking music be indoors. Multiple restaurants downtown are making music. This is a <br />quality of life issue. He expressed thanks for consideration on both sides. <br />Mark Oberholzer, 224 Hoover Avenue, resident and owner of the former Blue Parrot <br />building and Tilt pinball, who also serves as Chairman of BRaD, noted as a business <br />owner and resident he is against the ordinance BRaD discussed this and voted <br />unanimously to recommend against the ordinance. It is solving a problem that doesn't <br />need solving Police and staff can handle this Perhaps a modified ordinance in the <br />future if needed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.