Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 5, 2017 <br />Page 14 of 18 <br />Councilmember Leh stated we need to be very careful we don't make the situation <br />worse by regulation The question is what approach to take. He thinks staying the <br />course makes the most sense. We will never get nd of all noise complaints; it is a <br />questions of how you are going to address the complaints The PD doesn't generally <br />police things that aren't being complained about Residents should complain if they <br />want to and an officer should be able to come resolve it easily, the business community <br />has the responsibility to police themselves too. If the move to a decibel level approach <br />is going to get single complaints that may end up shutting down a business activity; is <br />that the power you want to give one resident The PD can educate and resolve issues If <br />regulated as proposed, we are going to get more complaints about the ordinance than <br />about the noise <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated there are concerns, but this proposed ordinance may not <br />be the best approach. He challenged the DBA and BRaD to suggest a different <br />approach and present it to Council <br />Chief Hayes noted the previous lore was the noise ordinance didn't apply downtown <br />and before midnight New direction is to talk to anyone and everyone who has a <br />complaint. The police department is trying to educate people it is okay to call the police <br />and let them try to mediate, resolve and document any issues. Their preference is <br />always to try to resolve the issue without a summons. <br />Councilmember Maloney was supportive of the recommendation to stay the course. He <br />thanked the police department for their efforts <br />Mayor Muckle agreed and also supported Mayor Pro Tem Lipton's suggestion He <br />expressed support for proactive efforts for education and engagement. <br />Mayor Muckle recapped the consensus to follow the Legal Committee recommendation <br />and also to suggest to BRaD and the DBA to discuss this and bring suggested solutions <br />to the Council <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION/ACTION — POLICY REGARDING NON-PROFIT <br />ORGANIZATIONS <br />Councilmember Leh stated the Legal Review Committee (LRC) discussed the policy for <br />non-profit organizations for a long time Most of the stakeholders in this have chimed in <br />and the LRC has a much better policy as a result This was drafted to address several <br />issues in the City's dealings with nonprofit organizations Louisville has a lot of nonprofit <br />organizations, some of which the City supports with grant dollars Some of those <br />associated with City boards have issues of what functions should be independent of <br />City's control legal liability; how much staff assistance to provide if any; and issues of <br />compliance with open records and open meeting rules The City needs to treat nonprofit <br />organizations consistently across the board. This would not apply to any nonprofit that <br />