My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2017 10 02 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2017 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2017 10 02 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:26 PM
Creation date
10/3/2017 11:09:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B5
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2017 10 02 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2 <br />City of Louisville City Council Interviews <br />Summary Report for Council Effectiveness Session <br />June E. Ramos, Facilitator <br />jramosassoc@mindspring.com <br />October 2, 2017 <br />Introduction: The following data is a summary of comments made to June Ramos during the <br />interview/assessment phase of the team effectiveness process. The words and language are <br />pulled from and paraphrased from the interviews — based on June's notes. Any errors in <br />interpretation are hers alone. <br />You will observe that in some cases perceptions of Council team members differ — one person <br />may comment about a specific strength, and that same strength may also show up as a <br />weakness or opportunity for improvement, as reported by someone else. This is due to the <br />varying perceptions of the individuals interviewed. <br />1 recommend spending no time on trying to 'figure out" who said what. Use this as an <br />opportunity to learn from the interview data and compare perceptions, adding to and creating <br />a rich discussion about how you can be even more successful. <br />As you review Question 1, all comments by an individual Council member are combined <br />together in the same bullet point. For the remaining questions, Ramos combined common <br />themed comments; in some cases, you will see a duplicate of the same wording. That indicates <br />that more than one person made the same statement, using the exact or very similar words. <br />DATA INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES - How to "review" the data: <br />• Respect different frames of reference — these are people's perceptions; not everyone <br />thinks alike or sees the world the same <br />• Be non -defensive <br />• Spend no time trying to identify the source <br />• Read or listen in the session for true understanding <br />• Don't shoot the messenger <br />• Use the data to focus on improvement — feedback is the gift that allows us to do that <br />• Do not use this data for retaliation or retribution or blame <br />• "Own" the data — if the data point is true for you, please speak up. Be ready to provide <br />relevant examples. <br />As you review the data, please answer the following questions in preparation for our planning <br />session. <br />1. What questions do I have about the data? <br />2. My reactions - What made me Sad, Mad, or Glad as I reviewed the data? <br />3. What are the critical priorities to address first? <br />4. What ideas and solutions do I have to address critical areas to improve this team? <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.