Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2017 09 14

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 10, 2017 Page 5 of 19 service/delivery and emergency access and parking lot design. Intended from the sites, and notes that if the site developed with smaller lots, it is possible more access drives could be built. Staff does not find, however, that the application meets the intent of the conservation easement with respect to the access drive that enters it on the western portion at CTC Blvd. Staff acknowledges that access drives cross the conservation easement on other properties in CTC, and the PUD proposes an access drive that will cross the easement on the eastern side to S 104th Street. These access drives are acceptable because there are no reasonable alternatives for accessing the property off of S 104th Street. Staff finds the access drive on the west has reasonable alternatives and could be relocated out of the easement. IDDSG: 4. Architecture • Ordinance 1725 conditions not met Staff reviewed the architecture subject to Ordinance 1725, a the application does not comply. IDDSG: 7. Sign Design • Waiver for wall -mounted signs o Up to three wall -mounted signs o Up to six feet tall and 20 feet wide e o Maximum character height of 48 inches viously discussed, finds The PUD includes a waiver for wall -mounted signage to . up to three wall -mounted signs up to 6' tall and 20' wide, with a maximum character height Staff supports the request due to the dist. -oft' - g fro42 and finds the signs will not appear excessively lar • .d are at a let on to the building size. In addition to the IDDSG and the 17.28.120 of the Louisville Municip attachment in the p plication must also comply with Section analysis of these criteria is provided as an Staff Recommendations. Staff recommends Planning Commission move . deny Resolution 19, Series 2017 for a final Planned Unit Development for Lot 1, Block 3, Colorado Technological Center because it does not meet the conditions of Ordinan1725 with respect to architecture. Alt If Planning Commission recommendspproval, Staff recommends the following Conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the Parks Department memo dated July 28, 2017 prior to the public hearing before City Council. 2. The applicant shall include a note on the PUD confirming that the property owner will be responsible for installation and maintenance of all landscaping in Outlots B, C and F, and within the Conservation Easement Areas No. 2 and No. 3. 3. The northern access drive to CTC Blvd located in the Easement Area No. 2 shall be relocated out of Easement Area No. 2. 4. Planning Commission read into the record their findings of compliance for the PUD criteria in place of staff's determination of non-compliance. Commission Questions of Staff. Moline says even though the City owns Outlots B and F, the applicant is required to landscape those. Is that per the previous subdivision agreement? Ritchie says yes.