Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 19, 2017 <br />Page 6 of 14 <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated there is a lot to like about this proposal, but would like to <br />see a few things to dress up the building. Council made a significant concession to <br />rezone this to industrial and expected a higher level of design on this building. He would <br />like to see more articulation, materials, and color which would be helpful to the proposal <br />Would like to give staff the discretion to incorporate some of these changes and <br />approve the proposal. <br />Mayor Muckle stated he thinks the proposal meets the requirements of the ordinance, <br />particularly the landscaping enhancements He asked about the lighting issue. <br />Vasbinder stated all lights will be LEDs and all will be cutoff fixtures to minimize bleed <br />off to neighbors As to noise, the operation that creates noise is inside the building <br />including all loading and unloading, only sound should be traffic coming and going <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she agrees with Mayor Pro Tem Lipton She asked <br />staff if we will be able to provide the applicant with an approved sign design by March 1, <br />2018 Ritchie stated staff thinks this is possible if Council approves the design in the <br />wayfinding plan in October Director Zuccaro stated if no design is approved in October <br />the developer will provide a cash payment Councilmember Stolzmann stated she would <br />prefer we simply require the developer to provide the sign without the caveat, we should <br />not tie this to the rest of the process Councilmember Stolzmann stated her concern that <br />in the past we have taken payments for projects and later this payment doesn't cover <br />the cost of the project when it is finally installed <br />Vasbinder noted in the PUD package there is a sign, designed by the City, and there is <br />a cost associated with it. They will build the sign that is in the package if Council agrees <br />to that <br />Mayor Muckle supports Councilmember Stolzmann's suggestion <br />Councilmember Loo supports the sign process as well. Regarding the landscaping she <br />is concerned about the surrounding property that the City owns and stated the City <br />should put in more landscaping. She supports the entrances as designed. She agreed <br />with staff to have more interest on the north facade She agrees with Mayor Pro Tem <br />Lipton to move forward with approval and allow changes to be determined by staff. <br />Councilmember Maloney supports the project but also appreciates the concern that the <br />north side is basically a flat facade He supports Mayor Pro Tem Lipton's suggestion of <br />more articulation there be a condition on the approval He would like the condition <br />stated clearly. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked for more diverse materials on the north side and/or color, <br />and possibly some articulation He stated he doesn't want to cause any functional <br />issues for the building, just have more interesting architecture <br />