My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2017 10 27
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
UTILITY COMMITTEE (pka: Water Committee)
>
2006-2019 Water Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2017 Water Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2017 10 27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:46:10 AM
Creation date
10/30/2017 10:08:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
UCPKT 2017 10 27
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
`, Cityof <br />Om Louisville <br />COLORADO - SINCE 1878 <br />UTILITY COMMITTEE <br />COMMUNICATION <br />SUBJECT: <br />DATE: <br />POWERLINE UNDERGROUNDING FUND <br />MARCH 31, 2017 <br />PRESENTED BY: EMILY KROPF, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER <br />SUMMARY: <br />The City's franchise agreement with Xcel requires the company to budget and allocate <br />1% of the preceding year's electric gross revenues for Louisville to bury existing <br />overhead facilities underground. To use the 1°/0 fund, City staff must select projects that <br />are located in the right-of-way and at least 750 feet in length. Staff is looking for <br />comments on the following issues: <br />• Which projects, if any, should staff direct Xcel to start the design process for at <br />this time? <br />• Should the City consider during the biennial budget process investing any <br />funding outside of the 1°/0 fund for undergrounding? The additional cost to bury <br />CenturyLink's lines have not been included in the City's five-year Capital <br />Improvement Plan. <br />Background <br />There are several factors to consider when prioritizing projects. First, it can be difficult to <br />identify a specific cost for undergrounding as some projects are more expensive than <br />others due to various challenges (i.e. type of infrastructure, geographic location, other <br />utility lines). Second, a power line that has private services lines connected to it for <br />residences or commercial properties may not result in a significantly improved <br />appearance as the poles that connect the private services lines would remain unless the <br />City picked up the additional cost to bury those lines. Third, undergrounding may not <br />result in more consistent service. Xcel has found that burying utility lines does not <br />necessarily improve service reliability as the majority of issues that result in outages <br />involve other unexpected issues like animal interference or equipment failure. <br />Staff has previously used the Xcel 1% fund to bury overhead lines in the downtown <br />business district when we could cost-effectively do so as part of construction activity <br />immediately adjacent to the overhead lines and to avoid undergrounding work at a later <br />date that would damage recently installed asphalt and concrete work (the "dig once" <br />approach). The current balance of the fund is $1,574,940. Xcel allows for a 3 -year <br />borrow ahead, which adds another $800,000 to the fund, resulting in a total of about <br />$2,375,000. Staff recommends maintaining a minimum balance of $500,000 to use in <br />conjunction with future capital projects (i.e. traffic signals on State Highway 42). <br />Therefore, the total amount available is about $1,875,000. <br />UTILITY COMMITTEE COMMUNICATION <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.