My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2017 08 22
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2017 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2017 08 22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2025 2:15:47 PM
Creation date
10/30/2017 12:29:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
Paper copy disposed of on November 26 2025
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2017 08 22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />August 22, 2017 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />New State regulations deal more with small cell facilities. The new regulations <br />say small cell facilities are use -by -right in all zoned districts. License agreements <br />may be an option for facilities located in the right-of-way. <br />The current code is 20 years old and has had only a few amendments. A Special <br />Review Use or PUD requirement is needed for most facilities and there are no <br />right-of-way or public safety provisions. <br />Current code does not allow for freestanding structures, facilities and not allowed <br />in residential zoned areas, but every district has an administrative option. We will <br />need to decide if this administrative review is sufficient or needs to be updated. <br />Director Zuccaro asked Council for feedback on if we are happy with the current <br />administrative process or do we want something more strict. <br />Councilmember Maloney noted the 2017 broadband ballot issue will affect this <br />discussion and should be kept in mind for future options. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated we do have a lot of areas that lack coverage. <br />We need to incentivize that as well as update the code. <br />Councilmember Loo noted the new rules may preclude a lot of City and public <br />input which might frustrate residents. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated we probably shouldn't prohibit freestanding <br />options in limited use if that is the only option in some locations. <br />Director Zuccaro stated the process will include public outreach to get input from <br />residents and industry on any proposed changes. <br />Discussion — Open Government <br />City Attorney Light presented information on transparency and public <br />participation. These are basic expectations of the citizens for meetings. <br />Discussion included meeting rules of three or more Councilmembers discussing <br />public business, quorum rules, and executive sessions. Policy discussions must <br />all be held in a public meeting. <br />Members discussed what role members should take at a committee meeting on <br />which they are not members. <br />Members discussed electronic communications and how they are covered by the <br />open meetings law and the open records act. City Attorney Light noted <br />ownership of the media is not the issue, the content of the record is. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.