Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 17, 2017 <br />Page 5 of 15 <br />Staff recommends approval with one condition. Prior to City execution and recording, <br />the final legal descriptions shall be submitted for review and approval by City staff and <br />added to the GDP amendment and PCZD agreement. <br />Applicant Presentation <br />Jim Candy, co -pastor of Ascent Church, stated they want to keep their church in <br />Louisville and add benefit to Louisville. It is central to who they are as a church <br />community. The Church has grown greatly over the past four years and many who <br />attend live in town. The church wants to be an asset not a liability to the community It is <br />important to the church not to disturb residents or cause traffic issues They want to <br />develop this site and hope to spur further development in the area. <br />David Andrews, 1114 West 7th Avenue, Denver, noted this property is not contiguous to <br />residential, is consistent in use to the GDP, and would not change effects of light, traffic <br />or noise. He realizes they will still have to go through a full process. <br />Public Comments <br />Tony Gamby, 1851 Gallagher Lane, has lived here about 3.5 years. He loves the <br />community and variety that makes the area great. The community has a great balance <br />and this church is here with open doors to benefit the community. This is a way to bring <br />balance and health and resources to the community as a whole. <br />Sara Estrada stated her family moved to Louisville to be closer to Ascent and the <br />community. The church is welcoming to everyone and supports many young families in <br />Louisville The church is fostering a strong sense of community in Louisville with close <br />to 1000 attendees each Sunday <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated the amendments meet the requirements of the <br />original review process and the amendments do not affect the gross density or the <br />character of the overall plan so she supports the ordinance. <br />Councilmember Maloney supports the application, but noted he struggles with the fiscal <br />model. The project meets the intent of the zoning. <br />Mayor Muckle agreed the fiscal analysis is flawed, but not enough to stop this <br />application. The criteria are all met as staff noted and he supported the application <br />Public Comments — None <br />Mayor Muckle closed the public hearing <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton also supported the application and moved to approve Ordinance <br />No 1748, Series 2017, Councilmember Maloney seconded. <br />