Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 17, 2017 <br />Page 8 of 15 <br />• The Consolidated Utility Fund (Water, Wastewater, and Storm Water Funds) <br />reserves are projected to increase by $385,000 to $17 5 million at the end of <br />2018. Ending reserves for all the individual utility funds are projected to remain <br />in compliance with the City's Reserve Policy. Only the Storm Water Utility Fund <br />is projected to approach its minimum during 2018 <br />• The Golf Course Fund is projected to increase its reserves by approximately <br />$75,000 during 2018. <br />Per Council's directive on October 10 the presentation included. <br />• New calculation of General Fund transfer <br />• General Fund transfers begin in 2018 <br />• Removal of Capital Projects Fund transfers <br />• Reclassification of Hwy 42 Multi -use Underpass from the Open Space & <br />Parks Fund to Capital Projects Fund <br />Finance Director Watson noted there were a number of attachments in the packet <br />providing more detail. <br />Mayor Muckle called for Public Comments — None <br />Mayor Muckle suggested discussing fund transfers first then any miscellaneous items. <br />Mayor Muckle suggested leaving the transfer between the General Fund and the Open <br />Space & Parks Fund alone for this year. It can then be addressed again in the 2019/20 <br />budget. <br />Councilmember Loo stated she was shocked to see the Open Space & Parks Fund <br />balance got so high so quickly. She thought the goal was to aim for 1.2 million over time <br />and suggested building back the fund balance more slowly She doesn't want to see a <br />huge fund balance when it could be used in the CIP or GF and giving more flexibility to <br />spend it Then there could be a transfer if needed for an acquisition. She would rather <br />see the Capital Projects fund to be higher and the Open Space & Parks fund lower. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann noted this came about by making the operating compete <br />with operating and capital to capital. Seeing what happens in the General Fund, she <br />noted operational costs are high and may cause problems in out years She would like <br />to discuss next year by looking at key indicators to determine what operational and <br />maintenance activities might not have been done at a satisfactory level. We really have <br />spent a lot on capital and continue to erode the operational expenditures in Parks and <br />this shows what it would cost to put it back. It could be done over time, but this is <br />realistic. She thought it was fine for the Capital Fund to go down to 1 million We should <br />