Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2017 11 15

Home Browse Search

Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes September 20, 2017 Page 6 of 7 requirement for a 3 -foot side yard setback to allow a 0 -foot side yard setback to construct an addition. Ritchie verified the application to be heard that evening was complete, and was mailed to surrounding property owners on September 1, 2017 published in the Boulder Daily Camera on September 3, 2017 and the property was posted on posted on September 1, 2017. Meseck moved and Stuart seconded a motion that all requirements have been satisfied and the application submitted by the applicants has been properly filed. Motion passed by unanimous voice vote. DeJong asked for disclosures from the board members for any site visits, ex parte communications, and any conflicts of interest or required disclosures on the application. All Board members indicated they did not have any ex parte communications or any conflicts of interest for the application. Staff Report of Facts and Issues: Ritchie reviewed the location of the property, noted the setbacks for the subject property and the surrounding area, and summarized the proposal. Staff Recommendations: Staff found that all six criteria in Municipal code Section 17.48.110 were met and recommended the Board of Adjustment approval of the variance request. Commission Questions of Staff: None heard. Applicant Presentation: Applicant: Nicole Ringelmann, 722 Pine St Ringlemann mentioned to the board that the goal was to never alter the exterior of the home, only the interior, and that she went through the process to get the property landmarked. Ringlemann discussed the reasons for the 3 foot setback such as that the rear part of the house is falling off the original part of the house. There is also a small bathroom in that portion of the house with an extremely low roof, causing anyone taller to have to bend over in order to use the shower in the bathroom The whole flooring in the rear part is also deteriorating and rotting. Commission Questions of Applicant: Campbell asked if the applicant purchased the property this year. Ringelmann replied that she did. DeJong asked if the yellow house directly beside it was the applicant's property as well. Ringelmann said it was. Public Comment in Favor: None heard. Public Comment Against: None heard.