Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2017 11 20

Home Browse Search

Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes October 16, 2017 Page 3 of 10 Haley agreed, stating that the social history of the structure was difficult to let go, but a request from the original owners was an important factor to consider. Koertje stated that the home was eligible for landmarking and that there was high social significance due to the importance of the Buffo family. He added that the house had been modified, but it could still be part of a historic district in Old Town. Wiring and windows would be covered by a grant. On the other hand, the structural and wiring issues with the structure suggested demolition. He added that the case is unusual as the request is being made by the original owners of the home. Ulm stated that having an estimated cost would have made the Commission's decision easier. The social significance in remaining in the family is important, as is the applicant's sensitivity to design. Ulm asked the applicant to make sure the new home would respect the neighborhood. Chuck Thomas agreed that an estimated cost would help their decision. In the past there have been structures that have been remarkable in appearance and are still restored structures. He acknowledged that restoration was not cheap, but that the grant would help cover it. He also agreed that the applicant being the original family was relevant, but concluded that the Commission did not have enough information to make a decision. Haley stated that the Commission did not have any power over the new structure regardless. She added that it could be a creative project and that the block could benefit from having another landmarked home. Without knowing the cost it is difficult to make a decision. She stated that the home would be a great loss to the neighborhood. Motion made by Fahey to release the demolition permit based on the finding that the social significance will be maintained by the family ownership and the continued location in Jefferson Place, and that the structure did not hold architectural significance to warrant preserving it. Seconded by Chuck Thomas. Roll call vote. Commissioners Koertje, Chuck Thomas, Ulm, and Chair Haley voted nay. Commissioner Fahey voted yay. Motion was denied 4-1. Motion made by Koertje to place a 180 -day stay on the permit in order for the applicant and staff to assess if the structure could be preserved, possibly using grants. The Commission could discuss the permit further at a next meeting. Seconded by Ulm. Roll call vote. Commissioners Ulm, Chuck Thomas, Koertje, and Chair Haley voted yay. Fahey voted nay. Motion passed 4-1. Buffo asked about next steps. Haley recommended that the applicant get financial estimates and that staff would be in contact with the applicant for other next steps. Zuccaro stated that there will be a re -notice process since the issue was not continued. Chuck Thomas said the applicant could also wait for the stay to expire and then do what they want. Sign at 640 Main Street Landmark/Grant/Alteration Certificate Ritchie presented the staff report for a request to landmark, a Landmark Alteration Certificate and a grant for alterations to the Blue Parrot sign at 640 Main Street. Bridget Bacon at the