Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 6, 2017 <br />Page 12 of 17 <br />Mayor Muckle opened the public hearing <br />Planner Ritchie stated the proposed ordinance amends Title 16 and Title 17 regarding <br />subdivision applications, modifications and approval processes. City Council included in <br />the 2017 Work Plan a review of the procedure for allowing zoning variances that are <br />part of subdivision requests. Council discussed this at a study session in May and the <br />Planning Commission held public hearings in August and September <br />The revisions include. <br />Minor Miscellaneous Amendments <br />• Revise the definitions for "Lot" and "Street" in Title 16 and Title 17 in order <br />to prohibit lots fronting an alley <br />Revise the minimum number of copies for preliminary and final plat <br />submittals. <br />Revise the notification distance from 300 feet to 500 feet for minor <br />subdivisions in one section for consistency. A previous code amendment <br />changed this to 500 feet in the remaining sections of the code <br />• Replace the term "variance" with "modification" for consistency throughout <br />Title 16 <br />Modifications — Section 16.24 <br />• Sec 16.24.010 — Modifications sets forth the means of review by Planning <br />Commission and City Council. It also includes language regarding the <br />public good, keeping the intent of Title 16 and Title 17, and meeting the <br />intent of the Comp Plan. <br />• Sec. 16 24.020 — Modification procedure requires that modification <br />requests are reviewed as part of the subdivision application and not as a <br />separate process, and not eligible for review by the BOA <br />• Sec 16 24.030 — Modification review criteria <br />• If accompanied by a PUD <br />• If not accompanied by a PUD <br />Planner Ritchie noted there was more detail on those modifications in the packet and <br />she could review with Council if they wished Staff recommends approval <br />Public Comments = None <br />Mayor Muckle asked if this would not allow new dwelling units Planner Ritchie noted <br />