Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 5, 2017 <br />Page 10 of 12 <br />Councilmember Maloney stated he supports the pooling language as written and two <br />minutes on second round comments. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated the parliamentary procedure gives everyone a level <br />playing field so they know what to expect. She would like to add which motions are <br />debatable or are not and more clanty on what requires a majority rather than <br />supermajority. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann suggested a list of general motions commonly made by <br />Council. <br />Councilmember Leh agreed that could be helpful Maybe as an appendix, how to make <br />a motion <br />Councilmember Stolzmann suggested a section regarding when one needs to be <br />recognized by the Chair, and to add point of appeal in case there is a disagreement on <br />rules. Mayor Muckle noted the appeal is already included. <br />Attorney Light stated postponing an item indefinitely can't be used for an ongoing <br />legislative body with no end point. We could write what it means to table something or <br />have a motion to take no further action. <br />Mayor Muckle asked why the Chair could not make a motion until others are offered <br />making the motion. Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated there is discretion on this and for <br />purposes of meeting efficiency it is helpful to have the chair make motions. Alternatively <br />the Chair can ask for a motion. He supported allowing the Chair to make motions. <br />Mayor Muckle suggested Council continue this to a later date to allow the Committee to <br />make suggested changes <br />Attorney Light noted the changes he had listed included; add language if consent <br />agenda is denied to reflect the items would then be considered individually as part of <br />the regular business agenda. Remove proviso for Chair making motions. Add common <br />motion chart and if debatable or not; and time pooling and second comment. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann noted section F concerning amendments to motions and felt <br />there didn't need to be limits. Councilmember Leh noted the rationale was a matter of <br />order and simplicity, not to discourage motions and friendly amendments. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked if language could say Council "shall strive" <br />Attorney Light cautioned it could be hard to determine what the meaning of stnve is If <br />the phrase to strive is added Council needs to be cognizant if the issue comes up, and <br />there is an ancillary debate on what "strive" means The way it gets resolved is the <br />Chair makes a point of order, makes the call, it goes to the full group and there is a right <br />of appeal to do that. <br />