My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2017 12 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2017 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2017 12 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:00 PM
Creation date
12/20/2017 10:15:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2017 12 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 5, 2017 <br />Page 6 of 12 <br />Committee needs/wants She doesn't think these are two viable choices The interior <br />programming is good and should include the storage. There is a need to decide on how <br />to fund this. If it is by ballot measure, she questioned if this design would gamer enough <br />community support <br />Councilmember Leh thanked the community for their input on this project. He noted the <br />museum may not rise to the top of the community needs, but it is critical we find a way <br />to move this project forward. Councilmember Leh liked the options shown tonight. Many <br />wanted an entrance on Main Street, but it seems clear that is not going to work It is <br />important to address the storage needs and would be shortsighted not to Not sure how <br />to address funding for this, maybe it is something to go to the voters for, recognizing tax <br />payers just approved a tax to help the museum. He liked the entrance on the side. <br />Mayor Muckle liked the false front and materials changes and was comfortable with the <br />design and felt the plaza off Main Street is valuable. He was prepared to move the <br />design forward and discussion of the funding will have to happen soon, including <br />polling He supported reducing the size of awning if possible <br />MOTION Councilmember Keany moved to approve the final conceptual plan based on <br />the north access design and including the expanded basement storage area. <br />Councilmember Leh seconded <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if this includes endorsing cost estimates or this is just <br />design. Councilmember Keany stated this is just design to allow the History Foundation <br />to begin a fund raising campaign We don't need to accept the cost estimates now. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated this should be about architecture, not cost estimating at <br />this time <br />Councilmember Keany agreed This is a design endorsement to start the capital <br />campaign. <br />Councilmember Leh liked that approach; wondered if not accepting costs will hamper <br />ability to raise money. <br />Interim City Manager Balser stated costs can be amended and contingency upped if <br />needed We can start working on 30% design and get more specific numbers if Council <br />wants to give that direction <br />Councilmember Stolzmann would like polling on this design as the next step She would <br />rather get more community feedback before putting this on the ballot. If people don't <br />support it, maybe change the design She had heard a lot of excitement about <br />programming but not the facade design <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.