My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2017 12 18 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2017 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2017 12 18 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:00 PM
Creation date
1/17/2018 9:48:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2017 12 18 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 18, 2017 <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />Mayor Muckle stated all of the committee review and conversations have helped <br />council Councilmember Stolzmann disagreed saying she thinks sometimes when <br />things are already discussed at a committee it means a reduced conversation when it <br />comes to the full council <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton noted the utilities are an enterprise fund, it is different It is half of <br />the city budget and deserves more attention than other items. Having the full council <br />discuss these issues makes us less efficient. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton proposed trying to have financial information in Utility Committee <br />packets to help make decisions on rates The Finance Committee still has some role on <br />rates, but perhaps it should be more limited <br />Director Watson stated the purpose of financial statements is to give information on the <br />impacts on the long term finances. It sounds like we are now having the same <br />conversation in both committees There are many staff trying to manage all the data and <br />how it ties together. The purpose isn't to answer questions, but to determine what <br />questions need to be asked <br />Councilmember Stolzmann suggested using one study session per month to have a <br />special meeting that is a joint meeting of the Finance and Utility Committees <br />Mayor Muckle suggested perhaps a joint meeting but less often than once per month. <br />Members discussed how a joint meeting process might work and what the <br />consequences might be. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated this is overly complicated. We want more efficiencies, not <br />fewer. <br />Members decided to have financials put in the Utility Committee and Finance <br />Committee packets which will fold into the rate discussions. All of the Utility Fund <br />financials will be reviewed by the Utility Committee and they will discuss how this will <br />affect the long term financial plan. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked what other things the Utility Committee is doing <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated the Committee looks at water rights, as well as water <br />demand, and usage. Councilmember Keany stated much of it is keeping an eye on <br />things that relate to goals and objectives more than proposing policy. <br />Councilmember Loo asked if the broadband study should be included in the Utility <br />Committee. Members decided yes, that would be included in their duties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.